Rossouw Theresa M, Feucht Ute D, Melikian George, van Dyk Gisela, Thomas Winifred, du Plessis Nicolette M, Avenant Theunis
Institute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Department of Paediatrics, Kalafong Provincial Tertiary Hospital, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 21;10(7):e0133452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133452. eCollection 2015.
Limited data are available from the developing world on antiretroviral drug resistance in HIV-1 infected children failing protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy, especially in the context of a high tuberculosis burden. We describe the proportion of children with drug resistance mutations after failed protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy as well as associated factors.
Data from children initiated on protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy with subsequent virological failure referred for genotypic drug resistance testing between 2008 and 2012 were retrospectively analysed. Frequencies of drug resistance mutations were determined and associations with these mutations identified through logistic regression analysis.
The study included 65 young children (median age 16.8 months [IQR 7.8; 23.3]) with mostly advanced clinical disease (88.5% WHO stage 3 or 4 disease), severe malnutrition (median weight-for-age Z-score -2.4 [IQR -3.7;-1.5]; median height-for-age Z-score -3.1 [IQR -4.3;-2.4]), high baseline HIV viral load (median 6.04 log10, IQR 5.34;6.47) and frequent tuberculosis co-infection (66%) at antiretroviral therapy initiation. Major protease inhibitor mutations were found in 49% of children and associated with low weight-for-age and height-for-age (p = 0.039; p = 0.05); longer duration of protease inhibitor regimens and virological failure (p = 0.001; p = 0.005); unsuppressed HIV viral load at 12 months of antiretroviral therapy (p = 0.001); tuberculosis treatment at antiretroviral therapy initiation (p = 0.048) and use of ritonavir as single protease inhibitor (p = 0.038). On multivariate analysis, cumulative months on protease inhibitor regimens and use of ritonavir as single protease inhibitor remained significant (p = 0.008; p = 0.033).
Major protease inhibitor resistance mutations were common in this study of HIV-1-infected children, with the timing of tuberculosis treatment and subsequent protease inhibitor dosing strategy proving to be important associated factors. There is an urgent need for safe, effective, and practicable HIV/tuberculosis co-treatment in young children and the optimal timing of treatment, optimal dosing of antiretroviral therapy, and alternative tuberculosis treatment strategies should be urgently addressed.
在发展中世界,关于接受基于蛋白酶抑制剂的抗逆转录病毒疗法但治疗失败的HIV-1感染儿童的抗逆转录病毒药物耐药性的数据有限,尤其是在结核病负担较高的情况下。我们描述了接受基于蛋白酶抑制剂的抗逆转录病毒疗法失败后出现耐药突变的儿童比例以及相关因素。
对2008年至2012年间开始接受基于蛋白酶抑制剂的抗逆转录病毒疗法且随后出现病毒学失败并被转诊进行基因型耐药性检测的儿童数据进行回顾性分析。确定耐药突变的频率,并通过逻辑回归分析确定与这些突变的关联。
该研究纳入了65名幼儿(中位年龄16.8个月[四分位间距7.8;23.3]),大多患有晚期临床疾病(88.5%为世界卫生组织3期或4期疾病)、严重营养不良(年龄别体重Z评分中位数-2.4[四分位间距-3.7;-1.5];年龄别身高Z评分中位数-3.1[四分位间距-4.3;-2.4])、基线HIV病毒载量高(中位数6.04 log10,四分位间距5.34;6.47)以及在开始抗逆转录病毒治疗时频繁合并结核病感染(66%)。49%的儿童发现有主要蛋白酶抑制剂突变,且与年龄别体重和身高较低有关(p = 0.039;p = 0.05);蛋白酶抑制剂治疗方案持续时间较长和病毒学失败(p = 0.001;p = 0.005);抗逆转录病毒治疗12个月时HIV病毒载量未得到抑制(p = 0.001);开始抗逆转录病毒治疗时正在进行结核病治疗(p = 0.048)以及使用利托那韦作为单一蛋白酶抑制剂(p = 0.038)。多因素分析显示,蛋白酶抑制剂治疗方案的累计月数以及使用利托那韦作为单一蛋白酶抑制剂仍然具有显著意义(p = 0.008;p = 0.033)。
在这项关于HIV-1感染儿童的研究中,主要蛋白酶抑制剂耐药突变很常见,结核病治疗时机和随后的蛋白酶抑制剂给药策略被证明是重要的相关因素。迫切需要为幼儿提供安全、有效且可行的HIV/结核病联合治疗,并且应紧急解决治疗的最佳时机、抗逆转录病毒疗法的最佳剂量以及替代性结核病治疗策略等问题。