Mahon Eugene J
Training and Supervising Analyst at the Center for Psychoanalytic Training and Research, Columbia College of Physicians & Surgeons, and is a member of the New York Freudian Society.
Psychoanal Q. 2015 Jul;84(3):665-93. doi: 10.1002/psaq.12024.
In this reading of Sophocles's Oedipus the King, the author suggests that insight can be thought of as the main protagonist of the tragedy. He personifies this depiction of insight, calling it Insight Agonistes, as if it were the sole conflicted character on the stage, albeit masquerading at times as several other characters, including gods, sphinxes, and oracles. This psychoanalytic reading of the text lends itself to an analogy between psychoanalytic process and Sophocles's tragic hero. The author views insight as always transgressing against, always at war with a conservative, societal, or intrapsychic chorus of structured elements. A clinical vignette is presented to illustrate this view of insight.
在对索福克勒斯的《俄狄浦斯王》的这种解读中,作者认为洞察力可被视为这部悲剧的主要主角。他将这种对洞察力的描绘拟人化,称其为“洞察力角力者”,仿佛它是舞台上唯一内心矛盾的角色,尽管它有时会伪装成其他几个角色,包括诸神、狮身人面像和预言者。这种对文本的精神分析解读有助于在精神分析过程与索福克勒斯的悲剧英雄之间建立一种类比。作者认为洞察力总是在违背、总是在与由结构化元素构成的保守的社会或心理内的合唱处于冲突之中。文中呈现了一个临床案例来说明这种对洞察力的观点。