Suppr超能文献

不同球员数量和训练方案对篮球控球训练生理及技术要求的影响

Effect of different number of players and training regimes on physiological and technical demands of ball-drills in basketball.

作者信息

Conte Daniele, Favero Terence G, Niederhausen Meike, Capranica Laura, Tessitore Antonio

机构信息

a Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences , University of Rome Foro Italico , Rome , Italy.

b Department of Biology , University of Portland , Portland , OR , USA.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2016;34(8):780-6. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1069384. Epub 2015 Jul 24.

Abstract

This study aimed to analyse the effects of two factors (number of players and training regimes) on players' physiological and technical demands in basketball ball-drills. Twenty-one young basketball players performed four different ball-drills (two levels for each factor). The number of players involved was 2vs2 and 4vs4, while ball-drill regimes were continuous and intermittent. Physiological demand was assessed using the percentage of maximal heart rate (%HRmax), Edwards' training load and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Furthermore, the following technical actions were collected: dribbles, steals, rebounds, turnovers, passes (total, correct, wrong and % of correct pass) and shots (total, scored, missed and % of made shot). A 2 × 2 (number of players × regime) two-way ANOVA with repeated measures was applied for physiological parameters and technical actions. The 2vs2 condition showed higher %HRmax (P < 0.001), Edwards' training load (P < 0.001), RPE (P < 0.001), number of dribbles (P < 0.001), rebounds (P < 0.001), passes [total (P = 0.005) and correct (P = 0.005)] and shots [total (P < 0.001) scored (P < 0.001) and missed (P < 0.001)] than 4vs4. Moreover, the continuous regime revealed higher %HRmax (P < 0.001), Edwards' training load (P < 0.001), RPE (P = 0.006) and dribbles (P < 0.001) than the intermittent regime. This study showed that both number of players and regime are useful variables able to modify basketball ball-drills workload.

摘要

本研究旨在分析两个因素(球员数量和训练方式)对篮球训练中球员生理和技术要求的影响。21名年轻篮球运动员进行了四种不同的篮球训练(每个因素两个水平)。参与训练的球员数量为2对2和4对4,而训练方式分为连续和间歇两种。使用最大心率百分比(%HRmax)、爱德华兹训练负荷和主观用力程度分级(RPE)来评估生理需求。此外,还收集了以下技术动作的数据:运球、抢断、篮板球、失误、传球(总数、正确、错误及正确传球百分比)和投篮(总数、命中、未命中及命中投篮百分比)。对生理参数和技术动作采用2×2(球员数量×训练方式)重复测量双向方差分析。结果显示,与4对4相比,2对2训练时的%HRmax(P<0.001)、爱德华兹训练负荷(P<0.001)、RPE(P<0.001)、运球次数(P<0.001)、篮板球数(P<0.001)、传球数[总数(P=0.005)和正确传球数(P=0.005)]以及投篮数[总数(P<0.001)、命中数(P<0.001)和未命中数(P<0.001)]均更高。此外,连续训练方式的%HRmax(P<0.001)、爱德华兹训练负荷(P<0.001)、RPE(P=0.006)和运球次数(P<0.001)高于间歇训练方式。本研究表明,球员数量和训练方式都是能够改变篮球训练负荷的有用变量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验