Seaman Jennifer B, Erlen Judith A
Jennifer B. Seaman, PhD, RN, Post-Doctoral Fellow (T32 HL007820), Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Judith A. Erlen, PhD, RN, FAAN, Professor and Chair, Department of Health and Community Systems, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Orthop Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;34(4):235-40; quiz 241-2. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000161.
Nursing workarounds have garnered increased attention over the past 15 years, corresponding with an increased focus on patient safety and evidence-based practice and a rise in the use of health information technologies (HITs). Workarounds have typically been viewed as deviations from best practice that put patients at risk for poor outcomes. However, this narrow view fails to take into consideration the multifactorial origins of workarounds. The authors explore the ways in which evidence-based protocols and HIT, designed to improve patient safety and quality, can have an unintended consequence of increasing the likelihood of nurses engaging in workarounds. The article also examines workarounds considering the ethical obligations of both nurses and administrative leaders to optimize patient safety and quality.
在过去15年里,护理工作中的变通方法受到了越来越多的关注,这与对患者安全和循证实践的关注度提高以及健康信息技术(HITs)使用的增加相一致。变通方法通常被视为偏离最佳实践的行为,会使患者面临不良后果的风险。然而,这种狭隘的观点没有考虑到变通方法的多因素起源。作者探讨了旨在提高患者安全和质量的循证方案和健康信息技术如何会产生意外后果,增加护士采取变通方法的可能性。本文还从护士和行政领导优化患者安全和质量的道德义务角度审视了变通方法。