Suppr超能文献

使用不同粘结树脂系统时纤维增强复合材料与饰面树脂复合材料之间的剪切粘结强度。

Shear Bond Strength between Fiber-Reinforced Composite and Veneering Resin Composites with Various Adhesive Resin Systems.

作者信息

AlJehani Yousef A, Baskaradoss Jagan K, Geevarghese Amrita, AlShehry Marey A, Vallittu Pekka K

机构信息

Dental Health Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Community Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2016 Jul;25(5):392-401. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12315. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this research was to evaluate the shear bond strength of different laboratory resin composites bonded to a fiber-reinforced composite substrate with some intermediate adhesive resins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mounted test specimens of a bidirectional continuous fiber-reinforced substrate (StickNet) were randomly assigned to three equal groups. Three types of commercially available veneering resin composites - BelleGlass®, Sinfony®, and GC Gradia® were bonded to these specimens using four different adhesive resins. Half the specimens per group were stored for 24 hours; the remaining were stored for 30 days. There were 10 specimens in the test group (n). The shear bond strengths were calculated and expressed in MPa. Data were analyzed statistically, and variations in bond strength within each group were additionally evaluated by calculating the Weibull modulus.

RESULTS

Shear bond values of those composites are influenced by the different bonding resins and different indirect composites. There was a significant difference in the shear bond strengths using different types of adhesive resins (p = 0.02) and using different veneering composites (p < 0.01). Belle-Glass® had the highest mean shear bond strength when bonded to StickNet substrate using both Prime & Bond NT and OptiBond Solo Plus. Sinfony® composite resin exhibited the lowest shear bond strength values when used with the same adhesive resins. The adhesive mode of failure was higher than cohesive with all laboratory composite resins bonded to the StickNet substructure at both storage times. Water storage had a tendency to lower the bond strengths of all laboratory composites, although the statistical differences were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, it was found that bonding of the veneering composite to bidirectional continuous fiber-reinforced substrate is influenced by the brand of the adhesive resin and veneering composite.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估不同实验室树脂复合材料与纤维增强复合基材通过一些中间粘结树脂粘结后的剪切粘结强度。

材料与方法

将双向连续纤维增强基材(StickNet)的测试样本随机分为三组,每组数量相等。使用四种不同的粘结树脂将三种市售的饰面树脂复合材料——BelleGlass®、Sinfony®和GC Gradia®粘结到这些样本上。每组样本的一半储存24小时;其余的储存30天。测试组有10个样本(n)。计算剪切粘结强度并以MPa表示。对数据进行统计分析,并通过计算威布尔模量额外评估每组内粘结强度的变化。

结果

这些复合材料的剪切粘结值受不同粘结树脂和不同间接复合材料的影响。使用不同类型的粘结树脂(p = 0.02)和不同的饰面复合材料(p < 0.01)时,剪切粘结强度存在显著差异。当使用Prime & Bond NT和OptiBond Solo Plus粘结到StickNet基材上时,Belle - Glass®的平均剪切粘结强度最高。当使用相同的粘结树脂时,Sinfony®复合树脂的剪切粘结强度值最低。在两个储存时间点,与粘结到StickNet子结构上的所有实验室复合树脂相比,粘结破坏模式高于内聚破坏模式。尽管统计差异不显著,但水储存倾向于降低所有实验室复合材料的粘结强度。

结论

在本研究的局限性内,发现饰面复合材料与双向连续纤维增强基材的粘结受粘结树脂和饰面复合材料品牌的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验