Ballard Elizabeth D, Luckenbaugh David A, Richards Erica M, Walls Tessa L, Brutsché Nancy E, Ameli Rezvan, Niciu Mark J, Vande Voort Jennifer L, Zarate Carlos A
Experimental Therapeutics & Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Sep;68:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
Rapid reduction of suicidal thoughts is critical for treating suicidal patients. Clinical trials evaluating these treatments require appropriate measurement. Key methodological issues include: 1) the use of single or multi-item assessments, and 2) evaluating whether suicidal ideation measures can track rapid change over time. The current study presents data from two randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trials evaluating ketamine in individuals with treatment-resistant depression (n = 60). Participants were assessed for suicidal thoughts using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Scale for Suicidal Ideation (SSI) at eight time points over three days. Assessments were compared using correlational analyses and effect sizes at 230 min and three days after ketamine infusion. Linear mixed models evaluated change in ideation across all time points. The HAM-D and MADRS suicide items demonstrated correlations of r > .80 with the first five items of the SSI (SSI5). On linear mixed models, an effect for ketamine was found for the HAM-D, MADRS, BDI items, and SSI5 (p < .001), but not for the full SSI (p = .88), which suggests a limited ability to assess change over time in patients with low levels of suicidal thoughts. Taken together, the results suggest that repeated suicidal assessments over minutes to days appear to detect improvement in suicidal thoughts after ketamine infusion compared to placebo. The MADRS suicide item, BDI suicide item, and SSI5 may be particularly sensitive to rapid changes in suicidal thoughts.
快速减少自杀念头对于治疗有自杀倾向的患者至关重要。评估这些治疗方法的临床试验需要适当的测量方法。关键的方法学问题包括:1)使用单项或多项评估;2)评估自杀意念测量方法能否追踪随时间的快速变化。本研究展示了两项随机、安慰剂对照、交叉临床试验的数据,这些试验评估了氯胺酮对难治性抑郁症患者(n = 60)的疗效。在三天内的八个时间点,使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)和自杀意念量表(SSI)对参与者的自杀念头进行评估。在氯胺酮输注后230分钟和三天时,使用相关分析和效应量对评估结果进行比较。线性混合模型评估了所有时间点意念的变化。HAM-D和MADRS自杀项目与SSI的前五项(SSI5)的相关性r > .80。在线性混合模型中,发现氯胺酮对HAM-D、MADRS、BDI项目和SSI5有显著效果(p < .001),但对完整的SSI没有效果(p = .88),这表明对于自杀念头水平较低的患者,评估随时间变化的能力有限。总体而言,结果表明,与安慰剂相比,在数分钟至数天内重复进行自杀评估似乎能检测出氯胺酮输注后自杀念头的改善。MADRS自杀项目、BDI自杀项目和SSI5可能对自杀念头的快速变化特别敏感。