Shibutani Masatsune, Maeda Kiyoshi, Nagahara Hisashi, Ohtani Hiroshi, Sakurai Katsunobu, Yamazoe Adaaki, Kimura Kenjiro, Toyokawa Takahiro, Amano Ryosuke, Kubo Naoshi, Tanaka Hiroaki, Muguruma Kazuya, Ohira Masaichi, Hirakawa Kosei
Department of Surgical Oncology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Abeno-ku, Osaka, Japan
Department of Surgical Oncology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Abeno-ku, Osaka, Japan.
Anticancer Res. 2015 Sep;35(9):5037-46.
Markers of systemic inflammation, such as the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP) level and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), have been reported to be useful prognostic indicators for various types of cancers. However, most of the existing reports investigated the preoperative status, and the significance of markers of systemic inflammation remains unclear in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the significance of markers of systemic inflammation for predicting the prognosis and chemotherapeutic outcomes and monitoring the progression of the tumor in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy.
A total of 110 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer who underwent palliative chemotherapy for metastatic tumors were enrolled in the study. We evaluated the relationships between the survival/chemotherapeutic response and pre-/post-treatment markers of systemic inflammation. The pre-treatment markers of systemic inflammation were measured within one week before the initiation of chemotherapy and the post-treatment markers of systemic inflammation were measured eight weeks after initiation of chemotherapy.
The overall survival rates were significantly worse in the group with high pre-treatment NLR/CRP/GPS, and that with high post-treatment CRP/GPS; the progression-free survival rate was significantly worse in the high post-treatment CRP group. As for chemotherapeutic response, patients with a low post-treatment CRP level had a significantly higher disease control rate than those with a high post-treatment CRP level. Moreover, the patients with a high pre-treatment CRP level and normalization after treatment exhibited better overall and progression-free survival rates and had a significantly higher disease control rate than those with high pre- and post-treatment CRP levels.
Pre-treatment markers of systemic inflammation are useful for predicting prognosis in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer who receive palliative chemotherapy. Moreover, the CRP level can be used as a marker for predicting chemotherapeutic outcome and monitoring the progression of the tumor.
据报道,全身炎症标志物,如中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)水平和格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS),是各类癌症有用的预后指标。然而,大多数现有报告研究的是术前状态,全身炎症标志物在无法切除的转移性结直肠癌患者中的意义仍不明确。本回顾性研究的目的是评估全身炎症标志物在预测接受姑息化疗的无法切除的转移性结直肠癌患者的预后和化疗结果以及监测肿瘤进展方面的意义。
本研究共纳入110例因转移性肿瘤接受姑息化疗的无法切除的转移性结直肠癌患者。我们评估了生存/化疗反应与全身炎症治疗前/后标志物之间的关系。全身炎症治疗前标志物在化疗开始前一周内测量,全身炎症治疗后标志物在化疗开始八周后测量。
治疗前NLR/CRP/GPS高的组以及治疗后CRP/GPS高的组总生存率显著更差;治疗后CRP高的组无进展生存率显著更差。至于化疗反应,治疗后CRP水平低的患者疾病控制率显著高于治疗后CRP水平高的患者。此外,治疗前CRP水平高且治疗后恢复正常的患者总生存率和无进展生存率更好,疾病控制率显著高于治疗前和治疗后CRP水平均高的患者。
全身炎症治疗前标志物有助于预测接受姑息化疗的无法切除的转移性结直肠癌患者的预后。此外,CRP水平可作为预测化疗结果和监测肿瘤进展的标志物。