Suppr超能文献

扎根理论研究中参与者对电话访谈的看法。

Participants' views of telephone interviews within a grounded theory study.

作者信息

Ward Kim, Gott Merryn, Hoare Karen

机构信息

The University of Auckland's School of Nursing, New Zealand.

The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2015 Dec;71(12):2775-85. doi: 10.1111/jan.12748. Epub 2015 Aug 10.

Abstract

AIM

To offer a unique contribution to the evolving debate around the use of the telephone during semistructured interview by drawing on interviewees' reflections on telephone interview during a grounded theory study.

BACKGROUND

The accepted norm for qualitative interviews is to conduct them face-to-face. It is typical to consider collecting qualitative data via telephone only when face-to-face interview is not possible. During a grounded theory study, exploring users' experiences with overnight mask ventilation for sleep apnoea, the authors selected the telephone to conduct interviews. This article reports participants' views on semistructured interview by telephone.

DESIGN

An inductive thematic analysis was conducted on data pertaining to the use of the telephone interview in a grounded theory study.

METHODS

The data were collected during 4 months of 2011 and 6 months in 2014. The article presents an inductive thematic analysis of sixteen participants' opinions about telephone interviewing and discusses these in relation to existing literature reporting the use of telephone interviews in grounded theory studies.

FINDINGS

Overall, participants reported a positive experience of telephone interviewing. From each participants reports we identified four themes from the data: being 'phone savvy; concentrating on voice instead of your face; easy rapport; and not being judged or feeling inhibited.

CONCLUSION

By drawing on these data, we argue that the telephone as a data collection tool in grounded theory research and other qualitative methodologies need not be relegated to second best status. Rather, researchers can consider telephone interview a valuable first choice option.

摘要

目的

通过借鉴扎根理论研究中受访者对电话访谈的反思,为围绕半结构化访谈中电话使用的不断发展的辩论提供独特贡献。

背景

定性访谈的公认规范是面对面进行。通常只有在无法进行面对面访谈时才会考虑通过电话收集定性数据。在一项扎根理论研究中,为探究用户使用夜间面罩通气治疗睡眠呼吸暂停的体验,作者选择通过电话进行访谈。本文报告了参与者对电话半结构化访谈的看法。

设计

对扎根理论研究中与电话访谈使用相关的数据进行归纳主题分析。

方法

数据收集于2011年的4个月和2014年的6个月。本文对16名参与者关于电话访谈的意见进行归纳主题分析,并结合现有文献中关于扎根理论研究中电话访谈使用情况的报道进行讨论。

结果

总体而言,参与者报告了电话访谈的积极体验。从每位参与者的报告中,我们从数据中识别出四个主题:精通电话;专注于声音而非面容;轻松建立融洽关系;不被评判或感到拘谨。

结论

通过利用这些数据,我们认为在扎根理论研究和其他定性方法中,电话作为一种数据收集工具不必屈居次选地位。相反,研究人员可以将电话访谈视为一个有价值的首选选项。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验