Villumsen Sidsel, Harðardóttir Guðrún Auður, Kangas Maarit, Gilstad Heidi, Brattheim Berit Johanne, Reponen Jarmo, Hypponen Hannele, Nøhr Christian
Department of Planning, Aalborg University, Denmark.
Dept. of Health Information Management, Directorate of health, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;218:138-144.
This paper set out to define the lessons learned from the process of characterizing the amount of practical use of eHealth on national level by collecting and comparing log data harvested from national logs in the Nordic countries. The health systems of the Nordic countries are quite similar in structure and their eHealth strategies include similar elements, however when confronted with the specific context in the different systems it proved challenging to define a common set of indicators for monitoring the practical use of eHealth. A thorough analysis of context leading to the definitions of the indicators is the basis needed due to the complexity of the data in the national logs. A comprehensive knowledge of the structure that underlines these logs is of utmost importance when striving for collecting comparable data. Although challenging, the process of defining indicators for practical use of eHealth by data harvested trough national logs is not an impossible task, but a task that requires in depth discussions of definitions of indicators as well as a substantial insight into the architecture and content of the national databases. There is need for continuous work on these indicators to ensure their quality and thus make sure that the defined indicators can meaningfully inform eHealth policies.
本文旨在通过收集和比较从北欧国家的国家日志中获取的日志数据,明确在国家层面描述电子健康实际使用量的过程中吸取的经验教训。北欧国家的卫生系统在结构上颇为相似,其电子健康战略包含类似要素,然而,面对不同系统中的具体情况时,事实证明,为监测电子健康的实际使用定义一套通用指标颇具挑战性。由于国家日志中的数据复杂,对导致指标定义的背景进行透彻分析是必要的基础。在努力收集可比数据时,全面了解这些日志背后的结构至关重要。尽管具有挑战性,但通过从国家日志中获取的数据为电子健康的实际使用定义指标的过程并非不可能完成的任务,而是一项需要深入讨论指标定义以及对国家数据库的架构和内容有深入见解的任务。需要持续致力于这些指标,以确保其质量,从而确保所定义的指标能够为电子健康政策提供有意义的信息。