Analgesic Solutions, Natick, MA, USA Tufts University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Boston, MA, USA Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc, Department of Clinical Development - Neuroscience, Canton, MA, USA INC Research, LLC, Biostatistics, Hendersonville, NC, USA.
Pain. 2015 Dec;156(12):2458-2467. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000315.
Opioid analgesics are commonly used for the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP); however, abuse potential is a major concern. This study used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, enriched-enrollment randomized-withdrawal study design to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and analgesic efficacy of an abuse-deterrent formulation of extended-release oxycodone, Xtampza ER, in opioid-naive and opioid-experienced adults with moderate-to-severe CLBP. Patients entered an open-label titration phase (N = 740); those who were successfully titrated on Xtampza ER (≥40 to ≤160 mg oxycodone hydrochloride equivalent per day) were randomized to active drug (N = 193) or placebo (N = 196) for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy results showed a statistically significant difference in average pain intensity from randomization baseline to treatment week 12 between the Xtampza ER and placebo groups (mean [±SE], -1.56 [0.267]; P < 0.0001). All sensitivity analyses results supported the primary result of the study. Secondary efficacy outcomes indicated that Xtampza ER vs placebo had more patients with improvement in patient global impression of change (26.4% vs 14.3%; P < 0.0001), longer time-to-exit from the study (58 vs 35 days; P = 0.0102), and a greater proportion of patients with ≥30% (49.2% vs 33.2%; P = 0.0013) and ≥50% (38.3% vs 24.5%; P = 0.0032) improvement in pain intensity. There was less rescue medication (acetaminophen) use in the Xtampza ER treatment group than in the placebo group. Xtampza ER had an adverse event profile consistent with other opioids and was well tolerated; no new safety concerns were identified. In conclusion, Xtampza ER resulted in clinically and statistically significant efficacy in patients with CLBP.
阿片类镇痛药常用于治疗慢性下腰痛(CLBP);然而,滥用潜力是一个主要关注点。这项研究使用了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、富集入组随机撤药研究设计,评估了一种延长释放羟考酮控释制剂(Xtampza ER)在慢性下腰痛(CLBP)的阿片类药物初治和经验丰富的成年患者中的安全性、耐受性和镇痛疗效。患者进入开放性滴定阶段(N=740);那些成功滴定 Xtampza ER(≥40 至≤160mg 盐酸羟考酮当量/天)的患者被随机分为活性药物(N=193)或安慰剂(N=196)治疗 12 周。主要疗效结果显示,Xtampza ER 组与安慰剂组从随机基线到治疗 12 周的平均疼痛强度有统计学显著差异(平均[±SE],-1.56[0.267];P<0.0001)。所有敏感性分析结果均支持研究的主要结果。次要疗效结果表明,与安慰剂相比,Xtampza ER 组有更多患者疼痛改善(26.4%对 14.3%;P<0.0001),退出研究的时间更长(58 天对 35 天;P=0.0102),且有更多患者疼痛强度改善≥30%(49.2%对 33.2%;P=0.0013)和≥50%(38.3%对 24.5%;P=0.0032)。与安慰剂组相比,Xtampza ER 组使用的解救药物(对乙酰氨基酚)较少。Xtampza ER 的不良事件谱与其他阿片类药物一致,且耐受性良好;未发现新的安全性问题。总之,Xtampza ER 使慢性下腰痛患者在临床和统计学上都具有显著疗效。