Dai Bibing, Li Juan, Chen Tingji, Li Qi
Center on Aging Psychology, Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Institute of Psychology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Psych J. 2015 Mar;4(1):28-37. doi: 10.1002/pchj.85.
Cognitive theories of emotional disorders indicate that biases in cognitive processes, such as attention, memory, and interpretation, are common factors that indicate vulnerability to these disorders, although their form varies according to the type of disorder. However, most of the studies have focused on adolescence and adulthood. It is still uncertain whether cognitive biases are risk factors for late-life depression. The present study sought to explore the role of interpretive bias in older adults with depressive symptoms and whether this effect is independent of basic cognitive abilities. Therefore, 18 older adults with depressive symptoms and 21 healthy controls were compared with an ambiguous facial expression identification task, a Mini Mental Status Examination, a Trail Making Test A and B, and a Word Fluency Test. Findings revealed that the depressive group was more likely to identify more ambiguous happy-sad facial expressions as indicative of sadness than were the healthy controls, but the two groups showed no significant differences in the cognitive test scores. These results suggest that interpretive bias indicates vulnerability to late-life depression, but basic cognitive abilities may have no influence in this context.
情绪障碍的认知理论表明,认知过程中的偏差,如注意力、记忆和解释,是表明易患这些障碍的常见因素,尽管其形式因障碍类型而异。然而,大多数研究都集中在青少年和成年人身上。认知偏差是否是晚年抑郁症的风险因素仍不确定。本研究旨在探讨解释偏差在有抑郁症状的老年人中的作用,以及这种效应是否独立于基本认知能力。因此,通过一个模糊面部表情识别任务、简易精神状态检查表、连线测验A和B以及词语流畅性测验,对18名有抑郁症状的老年人和21名健康对照者进行了比较。研究结果显示,与健康对照组相比,抑郁组更有可能将更多模糊的喜怒面部表情识别为悲伤,但两组在认知测试分数上没有显著差异。这些结果表明,解释偏差表明易患晚年抑郁症,但在这种情况下基本认知能力可能没有影响。