Suppr超能文献

[Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts of five common dental materials].

作者信息

Xu Yisheng, Yu Risheng

出版信息

Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Jun;33(3):230-3. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2015.03.003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare five materials commonly used in dentistry, including three types of metals and two types of ceramics, by using different sequences of three magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) field strengths (0.35, 1.5, and 3.0 T).

METHODS

Three types of metals and two types of ceramics that were fabricated into the same size and thickness as an incisor crown were placed in a plastic tank filled with saline. The crowns were scanned using an magnetic resonance (MR) machine at 0.35, 1.5, and 3.0 T field strengths. The TlWI and T2WI images were obtained. The differences of various materials in different artifacts of field MR scans were determined.

RESULTS

The zirconia crown presented no significant artifacts when scanned under the three types of MRI field strengths. The artifacts of casting ceramic were minimal. All dental precious metal alloys, nickel-chromium alloy dental porcelain, and cobalt-chromium ceramic alloy showed varying degrees of artifacts under the three MRI field strengths.

CONCLUSION

Zirconia and casting ceramics present almost no or faint artifacts. By contrast, precious metal alloys, nickel-chromium alloy dental porcelain and cobalt-chromium ceramic alloy display MRI artifacts. The artifact area increase with increasing magnetic field.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts of five common dental materials].
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Jun;33(3):230-3. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2015.03.003.
3
[Comparison of the two magnetic resonance deartifact techniques in imaging of different porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns].
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 1;37(1):66-69. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2019.01.013.
5
[Influences of three types of dental ceramic alloys on magnetic resonance imaging].
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2010 Jun;32(3):276-9. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.2010.03.008.
6
Influence of pulse sequence parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T on MRI artefacts produced by metal-ceramic restorations.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(8):20150136. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150136. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
7
Metallic artifacts in MRI caused by dental alloys and magnetic keeper.
Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 2008 Apr;52(2):205-10. doi: 10.2186/jjps.52.205.
10
[Artifacts from dental metal alloys in magnetic resonance imaging].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Jul 8;88(26):1855-8.

引用本文的文献

2
Unwanted effects due to interactions between dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging: a review of the literature.
Restor Dent Endod. 2018 Aug 30;43(4):e39. doi: 10.5395/rde.2018.43.e39. eCollection 2018 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
[The effect of the metallic dental materials on magnetic resonance imaging].
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Oct;28(5):505-8.
2
Artifacts from dental casting alloys in magnetic resonance imaging.
J Dent Res. 2003 Aug;82(8):602-6. doi: 10.1177/154405910308200806.
3
Improved MR imaging for patients with metallic implants.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Apr;18(3):287-95. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(99)00135-6.
4
Metallic stents: evaluation of MR imaging safety.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Sep;173(3):543-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.173.3.10470877.
5
Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques.
Radiology. 1994 Feb;190(2):565-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.190.2.8284417.
6
Dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging.
Invest Radiol. 1991 Jan;26(1):40-5. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199101000-00008.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验