Kim Kun Il, Lee Hee Sung, Kim Hyoung Soo, Ha Sang Ook, Lee Won Yong, Park Sang Jun, Lee Sun Hee, Lee Tae Hun, Seo Jeong Yeol, Choi Hyun Hee, Park Kyu Tae, Han Sang Jin, Hong Kyung Soon, Hwang Sung Mi, Lee Jae Jun
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, 22, Gwanpyeong-ro 170 beon-gil, Donan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 431-070, South Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Kyoungki-do, South Korea.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Aug 17;23:59. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0135-x.
In the emergency department (ED), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be used as a rescue treatment modality for patients with refractory circulatory and/or respiratory failure. Serious consideration must be given to the indication, and the PRESERVE and RESP scores for mortality have been investigated. However these scores were validated to predict survival in patients who received mainly veno-venous (VV) ECMO in the intensive care unit. The aim of the present study was to investigate the factors that predicted the outcomes for patients who received mixed mode (veno-arterial [VA] and VV) ECMO support in the ED.
This single center retrospective study included 65 patients who received ECMO support at the ED for circulatory or respiratory failure between January 2009 and December 2013. Pre-ECMO SAPS II and other variables were evaluated and compared for predicting mortality.
Fifty-four percent of patients received ECMO-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR), 31 % received VA and V-AV ECMO, and 15 % received VV ECMO. The 28-day and 60-month mortality rates were 52 % and 63 %. In the multivariate analysis, only the pre-ECMO Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) (odd ratio: 1.189, 95 % confidence interval: 1.032-1.370, p = 0.016) could predict the 28-day mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the optimal cutoff value for pre-ECMO SAPS II in predicting 28-day mortality was 0.852 (95 % CI: 0.753-0.951, p < 0.001) and 80 (sensitivity of 97.1 % and specificity of 71.0 %), respectively. Validation of the 80 cutoff value revealed a statistically significant difference for the 28-day and 60-month mortality rates in the overall, E-CPR, and VA groups (28-day: p < 0.001, p = 0.004, p = 0.005; 60-month: p < 0.001, p = 0.004, p = 0.020). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 28-day and 60-month survival rates were lower among the patients with a pre-ECMO SAPS II of ≤ 80, compared to those with a score of > 80 (both, p < 0.001).
The pre-ECMO SAPS II could be helpful for identifying patients with refractory acute circulatory and/or respiratory failure who will respond to ECMO support in the ED.
在急诊科(ED),体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)可作为难治性循环和/或呼吸衰竭患者的一种抢救治疗方式。必须认真考虑其适应证,并且已经对预测死亡率的PRESERVE和RESP评分进行了研究。然而,这些评分是在重症监护病房主要接受静脉-静脉(VV)ECMO治疗的患者中验证用于预测生存情况的。本研究的目的是调查在急诊科接受混合模式(静脉-动脉[VA]和VV)ECMO支持的患者的预后预测因素。
这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2009年1月至2013年12月期间在急诊科因循环或呼吸衰竭接受ECMO支持的65例患者。评估并比较了ECMO前的简化急性生理学评分II(SAPS II)及其他变量以预测死亡率。
54%的患者接受了ECMO心肺复苏(E-CPR),31%接受了VA和V-AV ECMO,15%接受了VV ECMO。28天和60个月的死亡率分别为%和63%。在多变量分析中,只有ECMO前的简化急性生理学评分II(SAPS II)(比值比:1.189,95%置信区间:1.032-1.370,p = 0.016)能够预测28天死亡率。预测28天死亡率时,ECMO前SAPS II的受试者工作特征曲线下面积和最佳截断值分别为0.852(95%CI:0.753-0.951,p < 0.001)和80(敏感性为97.1%,特异性为71.0%)。对截断值80进行验证发现,总体、E-CPR和VA组的28天和60个月死亡率存在统计学显著差异(28天:p < 0.001,p = 0.004,p = 0.005;60个月:p < 0.001,p = 0.004,p = 0.020)。在Kaplan-Meier分析中,与ECMO前SAPS II评分> 80的患者相比,评分≤ 80的患者的28天和60个月生存率更低(两者均p < 0.001)。
ECMO前的SAPS II可能有助于识别急诊科中对ECMO支持有反应的难治性急性循环和/或呼吸衰竭患者。