Morris Rebecca L, Kennedy Anne, Sanders Caroline
Centre for Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research (CLAHRC) Wessex, Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1044-61. doi: 10.1111/hex.12394. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
Whilst there has been a focus on the importance of social support for managing long-term conditions, there has been little specific focus on the characteristics of social networks that shape self-management. Policy emphasis is placed on individual responsibility for self-care, and this influences commissioning of health-care services. Assumptions are often made by policymakers about accessibility and preference for support and the influence of the social context on chronic illness management.
To examine the social networks of individuals with long-term conditions and identify how the characteristics of their composition influences support needs.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirty participants completed initial face-to-face in-depth interviews, telephone follow-ups and final face-to-face interviews in the north-west of England. A longitudinal qualitative design was used to elicit the subtle changes in relationships over a year.
The findings suggest that the relationships which constitute a social network influence perceived support needs and attitudes to self-management. The amalgamation of relationships was characterized into three network typologies (family focused, friend focused or health-care professional focused) according to which types of relationships were dominant. In the absence of support, accounts highlighted a small number of substitutes who could provide support at times of critical need.
This study challenges the notion of 'self'-management as an individual construct as many of the practices of illness management involved the support and/or negotiation of roles with others. By examining the nuances of relationships, this study has highlighted the tacit boundaries of practical and emotional support provision.
尽管一直强调社会支持对管理长期疾病的重要性,但对于塑造自我管理的社会网络特征却鲜有具体关注。政策重点在于个人的自我保健责任,这影响了医疗服务的委托安排。政策制定者常常对支持的可及性和偏好以及社会背景对慢性病管理的影响做出假设。
研究患有长期疾病的个体的社会网络,并确定其构成特征如何影响支持需求。
设计、背景和参与者:30名参与者在英格兰西北部完成了初次面对面深度访谈、电话随访和最终面对面访谈。采用纵向定性设计来揭示一年内人际关系的细微变化。
研究结果表明,构成社会网络的人际关系会影响感知到的支持需求和对自我管理的态度。根据占主导地位的人际关系类型,人际关系的融合被归纳为三种网络类型(以家庭为中心型!以朋友为中心型或医疗保健专业人员为中心型)。在缺乏支持的情况下,受访者提到了少数在急需时能够提供支持的替代者。
本研究对“自我”管理作为一种个体概念的观念提出了挑战,因为许多疾病管理实践都涉及他人的支持和/或角色协商。通过研究人际关系的细微差别,本研究突出了实际支持和情感支持提供的隐性界限。