Suppr超能文献

[扎普雷希奇地区女性避孕方法的使用及影响方法选择的因素:一项横断面研究]

[USE OF CONTRACEPTION IN WOMEN FROM THE ZAPRESIĆ AREA AND FACTORS INFLUENCING THE CHOICE OF METHOD: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY].

作者信息

Benčić Miro, Vrcić-Keglević Mladenka

出版信息

Acta Med Croatica. 2014 Dec;68(4-5):337-43.

Abstract

There have long been no surveys in the field of family planning in Croatia. There were some carried out by commercial agencies and some related to adolescents, but none focused on women of reproductive age. Therefore, we embarked upon this survey including women living in the town of Zaprešić and its surroundings. The aims of the study were to investigate how many of them used contraception, which methods prevailed, how they made their choice and whether demographic and health care characteristics had have any influence on it. This cross-sectional survey was conducted at eight family medicine practices from the town of Zaprešić town and six practices from nearby rural settings. We used a purposeful sampling method; women aged 18-45 visiting family medicine practices for different reasons were asked to participate in the study. Those that agreed were given a questionnaire designed for this survey and based on literature results. The questions were closed and related to the women's demographic and some health-related characteristics and those related to the usage of contraception, such as the method used, how they made their choice, if they made any changes and why. The STATA/IC 11.2 (license 30110536846) was used on data processing. Descriptive statistics was used with Pearson χ2-test and logistic regression analysis to determine associations between categorical variables and dependent variable, in this case contraception use or non-use. The value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Out of 283 women having filled in the questionnaire, 44.5% used some contraceptive methods. The most frequently used was condom (24.7%), then pill (24.1%) and combination of several methods (20.0%). The women living in the town used more coitus interruptus, and those living in rural areas used more pills. The most frequently stated reasons for the use of certain methods were as follows: the methods is simple for use (32.9%), it is safe (24.6%), and it is efficient and safe (22.8%). The women with elementary school preferred more efficient and those with high education safer methods. The efficiency of the method was also the main reason for university students. The majority of women made their decision in consultation with gynecologist (48.8%), then in agreement with partner (29.4%) and by her own choice (18.2%). Married and unmarried women made their decision in consultation with gynecologist and partner, unmarried women more with partner than married ones. Only 0.6% of women did consult their family doctors. They did not consider him/her as a professional to consult. In 45.5% of cases, women changed contraceptive methods, more women with high education. Mostly, they wished to use more efficient or safer method. The results of logistic regression analyses indicated that the predictors for contraceptive use were high education, working status, number of abortions and frequency of visits to gynecologist. In conclusion, only 44.5% of surveyed women used contraception, mainly condoms, pills and combination of methods. The efficacy and safety were important reasons, while gynecologists and partners were an important source of help on making decision. The place of living, age, education, married status and working status were associated with some aspects of contraceptive usage.

摘要

克罗地亚长期以来在计划生育领域没有进行过调查。曾有一些由商业机构开展的调查,还有一些是针对青少年的调查,但都没有聚焦于育龄妇女。因此,我们开展了这项涵盖扎普雷希奇镇及其周边地区女性的调查。该研究的目的是调查她们中有多少人使用避孕措施、哪种方法最为普遍、她们如何做出选择以及人口统计学和医疗保健特征是否对其有影响。这项横断面调查在扎普雷希奇镇的8家家庭医疗诊所和附近农村地区的6家诊所进行。我们采用了立意抽样法;因不同原因前往家庭医疗诊所就诊的18至45岁女性被邀请参与研究。同意参与的女性会收到一份基于文献结果为本调查设计的问卷。问题均为封闭式,涉及女性的人口统计学和一些与健康相关的特征以及与避孕措施使用相关的问题,比如所使用的方法、她们如何做出选择、是否有过改变以及原因。数据处理使用了STATA/IC 11.2(许可证编号30110536846)。使用描述性统计以及Pearson卡方检验和逻辑回归分析来确定分类变量与因变量(在本案例中为避孕措施的使用或未使用)之间的关联。p值<0.05被视为具有显著性。在填写问卷的283名女性中,44.5%使用了某种避孕方法。最常使用的是避孕套(24.7%),其次是避孕药(24.1%)以及多种方法联用(20.0%)。居住在城镇的女性更多使用体外射精法,而居住在农村地区的女性更多使用避孕药。使用特定方法最常提及的原因如下:方法使用简便(32.9%)、安全(24.6%)以及高效且安全(22.8%)。小学学历的女性更倾向于高效的方法,而高学历的女性更倾向于安全的方法。方法的有效性也是大学生选择的主要原因。大多数女性在咨询妇科医生后做出决定(48.8%),其次是与伴侣协商一致(29.4%)以及自行选择(18.2%)。已婚和未婚女性都在咨询妇科医生和伴侣后做出决定,未婚女性与伴侣协商的比例高于已婚女性。只有0.6%的女性咨询过她们的家庭医生。她们不认为家庭医生是值得咨询的专业人士。在45.5%的情况下,女性更换了避孕方法,高学历女性更换的更多。大多数情况下,她们希望使用更高效或更安全的方法。逻辑回归分析结果表明,避孕措施使用的预测因素包括高学历、工作状况、堕胎次数以及看妇科医生的频率。总之,只有44.5%的受访女性使用避孕措施,主要是避孕套、避孕药以及方法联用。有效性和安全性是重要原因,而妇科医生和伴侣是做出决定的重要帮助来源。居住地点、年龄、教育程度、婚姻状况和工作状况与避孕措施使用的某些方面相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验