Suppr超能文献

用于检测和鉴定临床样本中酵母的扩增ITS2区域的高分辨率熔解分析(HRM)的验证:与基于培养和基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF)的鉴定方法的比较

Validation of High Resolution Melting Analysis (HRM) of the Amplified ITS2 Region for the Detection and Identification of Yeasts from Clinical Samples: Comparison with Culture and MALDI-TOF Based Identification.

作者信息

Duyvejonck Hans, Cools Piet, Decruyenaere Johan, Roelens Kristien, Noens Lucien, Vermeulen Stefan, Claeys Geert, Decat Ellen, Van Mechelen Els, Vaneechoutte Mario

机构信息

Laboratory Bacteriology Research, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Education, Health and Social Work, University College Ghent, Keramiekstraat 80, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Laboratory Bacteriology Research, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 21;10(8):e0132149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132149. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

AIM

Candida species are known as opportunistic pathogens, and a possible cause of invasive infections. Because of their species-specific antimycotic resistance patterns, reliable techniques for their detection, quantification and identification are needed. We validated a DNA amplification method for direct detection of Candida spp. from clinical samples, namely the ITS2-High Resolution Melting Analysis (direct method), by comparing it with a culture and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry based method (indirect method) to establish the presence of Candida species in three different types of clinical samples.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 347 clinical samples, i.e. throat swabs, rectal swabs and vaginal swabs, were collected from the gynaecology/obstetrics, intensive care and haematology wards at the Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. For the direct method, ITS2-HRM was preceded by NucliSENS easyMAG DNA extraction, directly on the clinical samples. For the indirect method, clinical samples were cultured on Candida ID and individual colonies were identified by MALDI-TOF.

RESULTS

For 83.9% of the samples there was complete concordance between both techniques, i.e. the same Candida species were detected in 31.1% of the samples or no Candida species were detected in 52.8% of the samples. In 16.1% of the clinical samples, discrepant results were obtained, of which only 6.01% were considered as major discrepancies. Discrepancies occurred mostly when overall numbers of Candida cells in the samples were low and/or when multiple species were present in the sample.

DISCUSSION

Most of the discrepancies could be decided in the advantage of the direct method. This is due to samples in which no yeast could be cultured whereas low amounts could be detected by the direct method and to samples in which high quantities of Candida robusta according to ITS2-HRM were missed by culture on Candida ID agar. It remains to be decided whether the diagnostic advantages of the direct method compensate for its disadvantages.

摘要

目的

念珠菌属被认为是机会致病菌,也是侵袭性感染的可能病因。由于它们具有种特异性的抗真菌耐药模式,因此需要可靠的检测、定量和鉴定技术。我们通过将一种用于直接从临床样本中检测念珠菌属的DNA扩增方法,即内转录间隔区2-高分辨率熔解分析(直接法),与基于培养和基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱的方法(间接法)进行比较,以确定三种不同类型临床样本中念珠菌属的存在情况,从而对该方法进行了验证。

材料与方法

从比利时根特大学医院的妇产科、重症监护病房和血液科收集了总共347份临床样本,即咽拭子、直肠拭子和阴道拭子。对于直接法,在内转录间隔区2-高分辨率熔解分析之前,直接在临床样本上进行NucliSENS easyMAG DNA提取。对于间接法,临床样本在念珠菌鉴定培养基上培养,单个菌落通过基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱进行鉴定。

结果

在83.9%的样本中,两种技术结果完全一致,即在31.1%的样本中检测到相同的念珠菌属,或在52.8%的样本中未检测到念珠菌属。在16.1%的临床样本中获得了不一致的结果,其中只有6.01%被视为主要差异。差异大多发生在样本中念珠菌细胞总数较低和/或样本中存在多种菌种时。

讨论

大多数差异可以判定直接法更具优势。这是因为在一些样本中无法培养出酵母菌,但直接法能检测到少量酵母菌,以及在一些样本中,根据内转录间隔区2-高分辨率熔解分析检测到大量强壮念珠菌,但在念珠菌鉴定琼脂上培养时却未检测到。直接法的诊断优势是否能弥补其劣势仍有待确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验