Potfay Jonathan, Kaszala Karoly, Tan Alex Y, Sima Adam P, Gorcsan John, Ellenbogen Kenneth A, Huizar Jose F
From the Cardiology Division, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA (J.P., K.K., A.Y.T., J.F.H.); Cardiology Division/Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (J.P., K.K., A.Y.T., K.A.E., J.F.H.); School of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (A.P.S.); and Cardiology Division, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA (J.G. III).
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct;8(5):1194-200. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003047. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony caused by premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) has been proposed as a mechanism of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. We sought to understand the impact of different PVC locations and coupling intervals (prematurity) on LV regional mechanics and global function of the PVC beat itself.
Using our premature pacing algorithm, pentageminal PVCs at coupling intervals of 200 to 375 ms were delivered from the epicardial right ventricular apex, RV outflow tract, and LV free wall, as well as premature atrial contractions, from the left atrial appendage at a coupling interval of 200 ms in 7 healthy canines. LV short-axis echocardiographic images, LV stroke volume, and dP/dtmax were obtained during all ectopic beats and ventricular pacing. LV dyssynchrony was assessed by dispersion of QRS-to-peak strain (earliest-last QRS-to-peak strain) between 6 different LV segments during each of the aforementioned beats (GE, EchoPac). LV dyssynchrony was greater during long-coupled rather than short-coupled PVCs and PVCs at 375 ms compared with rapid ventricular pacing at 400 ms (P<0.0001), whereas no difference was found between PVC locations. Longer PVC coupling intervals were associated with greater stroke volume and dP/dtmax despite more pronounced dyssynchrony (P<0.001).
PVCs with longer coupling intervals demonstrate more pronounced LV dyssynchrony, whereas PVC location has minimal impact. LV dyssynchrony cannot be attributed to prematurity or abnormal ventricular activation alone, but rather to a combination of both. This study suggests that late-coupled PVCs may cause a more severe cardiomyopathy if dyssynchrony is the leading mechanism responsible for PVC-induced cardiomyopathy.
室性早搏(PVC)引起的左心室(LV)不同步被认为是PVC诱发心肌病的一种机制。我们试图了解不同PVC位置和联律间期(早搏程度)对LV局部力学以及PVC搏动本身的整体功能的影响。
在7只健康犬中,使用我们的早搏起搏算法,从右心室心外膜尖部、右心室流出道、左心室游离壁发放联律间期为200至375毫秒的五联律PVC,以及从左心耳发放联律间期为200毫秒的房性早搏。在所有异位搏动和心室起搏期间获取LV短轴超声心动图图像、LV每搏量和dP/dtmax。通过上述每次搏动期间6个不同LV节段之间的QRS波至峰值应变离散度(最早-最晚QRS波至峰值应变)评估LV不同步(GE,EchoPac)。与400毫秒的快速心室起搏相比,长联律PVC而非短联律PVC以及375毫秒的PVC期间LV不同步更大(P<0.0001),而PVC位置之间未发现差异。尽管不同步更明显,但较长的PVC联律间期与更大的每搏量和dP/dtmax相关(P<0.001)。
联律间期较长的PVC表现出更明显的LV不同步,而PVC位置影响极小。LV不同步不能仅归因于早搏程度或异常心室激动,而是两者的综合作用。这项研究表明,如果不同步是PVC诱发心肌病的主要机制,那么晚联律PVC可能导致更严重的心肌病。