Nijenhuis Matthijs V, Rutgers Emiel J Th
Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Breast. 2015 Nov;24 Suppl 2:S96-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.07.023. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
Multifocal (MF) and multicentric (MC) breast cancer is regularly considered a relative contraindication for breast-conserving therapy (BCT). There are two reasons for this wide spread notion: However, we concur that if optimal 'cytoreductive surgery' is achieved this will result in good local control (i.e. in-breast relapse <10% at 10 years). This can only be achieved on the basis of the right imaging, image guidance for non-palpable foci, and tumor free (invasive as well as ductal carcinoma in situ) margins after adequate pathological assessment. Surgery must then be followed by whole breast irradiation and systemic treatments as indicated by primary cancer biology. Careful planning and adaptive application of oncoplastic techniques will result in an optimal cosmetic results. The meticulous work of Roland Holland and coworkers(1) in the early 1980's on whole breast specimen showed invasive foci at more then 2 cm distance from the invasive primary cancer in more then 40% of specimen. Although multiple tumor foci may occur in up to 60% of mastectomy specimens, equivalent survival outcomes were observed in prospective trials comparing BCT and mastectomy for clinically unifocal lesions, suggesting that the majority of these foci are not, or do not become, biologically relevant or clinically significant with appropriate treatment. As diagnostic tools advance, MF and MC tumors are more commonly diagnosed. Cancers that previously would have been classified as unifocal now can be detected as MF or MC. In addition, locoregional treatment modalities have improved significantly over the past decade. More recent studies reflect these advances in diagnosis and treatment. Studies evaluated staging MRI showed that up to 19% of woman with diagnosed breast cancer harbor a second malignant ipsilateral lesion. These findings should only have consequences when additional lesions are proven cancer. Multiple enhancing lesions on MRI are in itself not an indication for a mastectomy. The Z0011 trial and the AMAROS trial demonstrated a similar phenomenon for axillary treatment; less surgery does not necessarily lead to inferior local control or survival outcomes. Recent studies supplement the growing evidence that treatment of patients with MF/MC breast cancer with BCS, radiotherapy, and adjuvant systemic therapy can result in low rates of in-breast recurrence.
多灶性(MF)和多中心性(MC)乳腺癌通常被视为保乳治疗(BCT)的相对禁忌证。这种广泛存在的观念有两个原因:然而,我们同意,如果能实现最佳的“细胞减灭术”,将能实现良好的局部控制(即10年时乳房内复发率<10%)。这只有在正确的影像学检查、对不可触及病灶的影像引导以及充分病理评估后达到无瘤(包括浸润性癌和原位导管癌)切缘的基础上才能实现。手术之后必须根据原发癌生物学特性进行全乳照射和全身治疗。精心规划并合理应用肿瘤整形技术将能获得最佳的美容效果。20世纪80年代初罗兰·霍兰德及其同事的细致工作表明,在超过40%的全乳标本中,浸润性病灶距离浸润性原发癌超过2厘米。尽管在高达60%的乳房切除标本中可能出现多个肿瘤病灶,但在比较BCT和乳房切除术治疗临床单灶性病变的前瞻性试验中观察到了相似的生存结果,这表明这些病灶中的大多数在经过适当治疗后并非生物学相关或临床上显著,或者不会变得生物学相关或临床上显著。随着诊断工具的进步,MF和MC肿瘤的诊断更为常见。以前会被归类为单灶性的癌症现在可以被检测为MF或MC。此外,在过去十年中,局部区域治疗方式有了显著改善。最近的研究反映了这些诊断和治疗方面的进展。评估分期MRI的研究表明,高达19%的确诊乳腺癌女性存在同侧第二个恶性病变。只有在额外病灶被证实为癌症时,这些发现才会产生影响。MRI上多个强化病灶本身并非乳房切除术的指征。Z0011试验和AMAROS试验在腋窝治疗方面也显示了类似现象;手术较少并不一定会导致较差的局部控制或生存结果。最近的研究补充了越来越多的证据,即采用保乳手术(BCS)、放疗和辅助全身治疗的MF/MC乳腺癌患者乳房内复发率较低。