Goldman Matthew L, Ghorob Amireh, Hessler Danielle, Yamamoto Russell, Thom David H, Bodenheimer Thomas
Center for Excellence in Primary Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Center for Excellence in Primary Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Aug;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S36-41. doi: 10.1370/afm.1756.
A randomized controlled trial found that patients with diabetes had lower HbA1c levels after 6 months of peer health coaching than patients who did not receive coaching. This paper explores whether the peer coaches in that trial, all low-income patients with diabetes, mastered and utilized an evidence-based health coaching training curriculum. The curriculum included 5 core features: ask-tell-ask, closing the loop, know your numbers, behavior-change action plans, and medication adherence counseling.
This paper includes the results of exams administered to trainees, exit surveys performed with peer coaches who completed the study and those who dropped out, observations of peer coaches meeting with patients, and analysis of in-depth interviews with peer coaches who completed the study.
Of the 32 peer coach trainees who completed the training, 71.9% lacked a college degree; 25.0% did not graduate from high school. The 26 trainees who passed the exams attended 92.7% of training sessions compared with 80.6% for the 6 trainees who did not pass. Peer coaches who completed the study wanted to continue peer coaching work and had confidence in their abilities despite their not consistently employing the coaching techniques with their patients. Quotations describe coaches' perceptions of the training.
Of low-income patients with diabetes who completed the evidenced-based health coaching training, 81% passed written and oral exams and became effective peer health coaches, although they did not consistently use the techniques taught.
一项随机对照试验发现,糖尿病患者在接受同伴健康指导6个月后的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平低于未接受指导的患者。本文探讨了该试验中的同伴指导者(均为低收入糖尿病患者)是否掌握并运用了基于证据的健康指导培训课程。该课程包括5个核心要素:询问-告知-询问、闭环沟通、了解你的数据、行为改变行动计划以及药物依从性咨询。
本文包括对学员进行的考试结果、对完成研究的同伴指导者和退出研究的同伴指导者进行的结业调查、对同伴指导者与患者会面的观察,以及对完成研究的同伴指导者进行的深度访谈分析。
在完成培训的32名同伴指导学员中,71.9%没有大学学历;25.0%没有高中文凭。通过考试的26名学员参加了92.7%的培训课程,而未通过考试的6名学员的这一比例为80.6%。完成研究的同伴指导者尽管没有始终如一地对患者运用指导技巧,但仍希望继续从事同伴指导工作,并对自己的能力有信心。文中引用了指导者对培训看法的原话。
完成基于证据的健康指导培训的低收入糖尿病患者中,81%通过了书面和口头考试并成为有效的同伴健康指导者,尽管他们并没有始终如一地运用所学技巧。