Nune George, DeGiorgio Christopher, Heck Christianne
Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, 1520 San Pablo St. Suite 3000, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA,
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2015 Oct;17(10):375. doi: 10.1007/s11940-015-0375-0.
Neuromodulation devices are used in the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy. This has been defined as epilepsy with persistent seizures despite adequate trials of at least two anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). In most cases of medically refractory partial epilepsy, the first choice of treatment is resective surgery if the seizure focus can be definitively localized and if surgery can be safely performed without causing intolerable neurologic deficits. Patients with medically refractory epilepsy who are not candidates for potentially curative surgery may benefit from the implantation of a neuromodulation device. While most of these devices require surgical implantation, they provide a significant added seizure reduction without typical medication side effects. Furthermore, the efficacy of these devices continues to improve over years. There are currently no head-to-head trials comparing the different neuromodulation devices but efficacy appears to be roughly similar. The choice of device therefore depends on the type of epilepsy, whether the seizure focus can be identified, and other clinical factors. Vagal Nerve Stimulation (VNS) does not require identification of the seizure focus and also carries an FDA indication for depression. While in the United States VNS is only approved for use in partial epilepsy, it is commonly used off-label to treat generalized seizures as well. VNS delivers stimulation on a scheduled basis, in response to patient activation, or in response to heart rate increases serving as a proxy for seizures. Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS) requires the identification of up to two seizure foci and delivers stimulation only in response to the detection of epileptiform activity. While it requires intracranial placement of electrodes, it allows for long-term monitoring of electrographic seizures and may be effective where VNS has not produced an optimal response. Deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus is not FDA approved at this time but is available in Europe and many other parts of the world. While it also carries an indication only for partial epilepsy, it does not require identification of the seizure focus and may be particularly helpful for temporal lobe epilepsy. It also appears effective in cases where VNS has not been sufficiently helpful. The Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation (TNS) system is another treatment modality which is not yet FDA approved but is available in Europe and other countries. Its mechanism of action is similar to the VNS system and it also appears to have anti-depression effects in addition to anti-epileptic benefits. However, the most compelling feature of TNS is that it is not implanted but rather applied to the skin with transdermal electrodes, typically at night.
神经调节装置用于治疗药物难治性癫痫。药物难治性癫痫被定义为尽管至少充分试用了两种抗癫痫药物(AEDs)仍有持续性发作的癫痫。在大多数药物难治性部分性癫痫病例中,如果癫痫病灶能够明确定位且手术能够安全进行而不引起难以忍受的神经功能缺损,首选治疗方法是切除性手术。不适合进行可能治愈性手术的药物难治性癫痫患者可能会从植入神经调节装置中获益。虽然这些装置大多需要手术植入,但它们能显著减少癫痫发作,且没有典型的药物副作用。此外,这些装置的疗效多年来持续提高。目前尚无比较不同神经调节装置的直接对比试验,但疗效似乎大致相似。因此,装置的选择取决于癫痫的类型、癫痫病灶是否能够确定以及其他临床因素。迷走神经刺激(VNS)不需要确定癫痫病灶,并且美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)还批准其用于治疗抑郁症。在美国,VNS仅被批准用于部分性癫痫,但也常用于治疗全身性癫痫的非适应证用药。VNS按预定时间、根据患者激活情况或根据作为癫痫发作替代指标的心率增加来进行刺激。响应性神经刺激(RNS)需要确定多达两个癫痫病灶,并且仅在检测到癫痫样活动时才进行刺激。虽然它需要将电极植入颅内,但它可以对脑电图癫痫发作进行长期监测,并且在VNS未产生最佳反应的情况下可能有效。丘脑前核的深部脑刺激目前尚未获得FDA批准,但在欧洲和世界其他许多地区可用。虽然它也仅适用于部分性癫痫,但它不需要确定癫痫病灶,可能对颞叶癫痫特别有帮助。在VNS帮助不大的情况下,它似乎也有效。三叉神经刺激(TNS)系统是另一种治疗方式,尚未获得FDA批准,但在欧洲和其他国家可用。其作用机制与VNS系统相似,除了抗癫痫作用外,似乎还有抗抑郁作用。然而,TNS最引人注目的特点是它不是植入式的,而是通过经皮电极贴在皮肤上,通常在夜间使用。