Xiong Ying-Zi, Yu Cong, Zhang Jun-Yun
J Vis. 2015 Aug 1;15(11):16. doi: 10.1167/15.11.16.
When an observer reports a letter flanked by additional letters in the visual periphery, the response errors (the crowding effect) may result from failure to recognize the target letter (recognition errors), from mislocating a correctly recognized target letter at a flanker location (target misplacement errors), or from reporting a flanker as the target letter (flanker substitution errors). Crowding can be reduced through perceptual learning. However, it is not known how perceptual learning operates to reduce crowding. In this study we trained observers with a partial-report task (Experiment 1), in which they reported the central target letter of a three-letter string presented in the visual periphery, or a whole-report task (Experiment 2), in which they reported all three letters in order. We then assessed the impact of training on recognition of both unflanked and flanked targets, with particular attention to how perceptual learning affected the types of errors. Our results show that training improved target recognition but not single-letter recognition, indicating that training indeed affected crowding. However, training did not reduce target misplacement errors or flanker substitution errors. This dissociation between target recognition and flanker substitution errors supports the view that flanker substitution may be more likely a by-product (due to response bias), rather than a cause, of crowding. Moreover, the dissociation is not consistent with hypothesized mechanisms of crowding that would predict reduced positional errors.
当观察者报告视觉外周中被其他字母包围的一个字母时,反应错误(拥挤效应)可能源于无法识别目标字母(识别错误)、将正确识别的目标字母错误定位在侧翼字母位置(目标误置错误),或者将侧翼字母报告为目标字母(侧翼字母替换错误)。拥挤可以通过知觉学习来减少。然而,尚不清楚知觉学习是如何起作用来减少拥挤的。在本研究中,我们用部分报告任务(实验1)训练观察者,在该任务中他们报告视觉外周呈现的三个字母字符串的中间目标字母,或者用整体报告任务(实验2)训练观察者,在该任务中他们按顺序报告所有三个字母。然后,我们评估训练对未被包围和被包围目标识别的影响,特别关注知觉学习如何影响错误类型。我们的结果表明,训练提高了目标识别能力,但没有提高单字母识别能力,这表明训练确实影响了拥挤。然而,训练并没有减少目标误置错误或侧翼字母替换错误。目标识别与侧翼字母替换错误之间的这种分离支持了这样一种观点,即侧翼字母替换更可能是拥挤的一种副产品(由于反应偏差),而不是拥挤的一个原因。此外,这种分离与预测位置错误减少的拥挤假设机制不一致。