Ramírez Juan Carlos, Cura Carolina Inés, da Cruz Moreira Otacilio, Lages-Silva Eliane, Juiz Natalia, Velázquez Elsa, Ramírez Juan David, Alberti Anahí, Pavia Paula, Flores-Chávez María Delmans, Muñoz-Calderón Arturo, Pérez-Morales Deyanira, Santalla José, Marcos da Matta Guedes Paulo, Peneau Julie, Marcet Paula, Padilla Carlos, Cruz-Robles David, Valencia Edward, Crisante Gladys Elena, Greif Gonzalo, Zulantay Inés, Costales Jaime Alfredo, Alvarez-Martínez Miriam, Martínez Norma Edith, Villarroel Rodrigo, Villarroel Sandro, Sánchez Zunilda, Bisio Margarita, Parrado Rudy, Maria da Cunha Galvão Lúcia, Jácome da Câmara Antonia Cláudia, Espinoza Bertha, Alarcón de Noya Belkisyole, Puerta Concepción, Riarte Adelina, Diosque Patricio, Sosa-Estani Sergio, Guhl Felipe, Ribeiro Isabela, Aznar Christine, Britto Constança, Yadón Zaida Estela, Schijman Alejandro G
Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Chagas Disease (LaBMECh), Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular (INGEBI-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Endemic Diseases, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Mol Diagn. 2015 Sep;17(5):605-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.04.010.
An international study was performed by 26 experienced PCR laboratories from 14 countries to assess the performance of duplex quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) strategies on the basis of TaqMan probes for detection and quantification of parasitic loads in peripheral blood samples from Chagas disease patients. Two methods were studied: Satellite DNA (SatDNA) qPCR and kinetoplastid DNA (kDNA) qPCR. Both methods included an internal amplification control. Reportable range, analytical sensitivity, limits of detection and quantification, and precision were estimated according to international guidelines. In addition, inclusivity and exclusivity were estimated with DNA from stocks representing the different Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing units and Trypanosoma rangeli and Leishmania spp. Both methods were challenged against 156 blood samples provided by the participant laboratories, including samples from acute and chronic patients with varied clinical findings, infected by oral route or vectorial transmission. kDNA qPCR showed better analytical sensitivity than SatDNA qPCR with limits of detection of 0.23 and 0.70 parasite equivalents/mL, respectively. Analyses of clinical samples revealed a high concordance in terms of sensitivity and parasitic loads determined by both SatDNA and kDNA qPCRs. This effort is a major step toward international validation of qPCR methods for the quantification of T. cruzi DNA in human blood samples, aiming to provide an accurate surrogate biomarker for diagnosis and treatment monitoring for patients with Chagas disease.
来自14个国家的26个经验丰富的PCR实验室开展了一项国际研究,以评估基于TaqMan探针的双重定量实时PCR(qPCR)策略在检测和定量恰加斯病患者外周血样本中寄生虫载量方面的性能。研究了两种方法:卫星DNA(SatDNA)qPCR和动基体DNA(kDNA)qPCR。两种方法均包含一个内部扩增对照。根据国际指南估计了报告范围、分析灵敏度、检测和定量限以及精密度。此外,用代表不同克氏锥虫离散型别单位、朗氏锥虫和利什曼原虫属的菌株的DNA评估了包容性和排他性。两种方法都针对参与实验室提供的156份血样进行了验证,包括通过口服途径或媒介传播感染的、具有不同临床表现的急性和慢性患者的样本。kDNA qPCR显示出比SatDNA qPCR更好的分析灵敏度,检测限分别为0.23和0.70个寄生虫当量/mL。临床样本分析显示,SatDNA和kDNA qPCR在灵敏度和所测定的寄生虫载量方面具有高度一致性。这项工作是朝着对用于定量人类血样中克氏锥虫DNA的qPCR方法进行国际验证迈出的重要一步,旨在为恰加斯病患者的诊断和治疗监测提供一种准确的替代生物标志物。