Kerkhoff Wim, Bolck Annabel, Mattijssen Erwin J A T
Firearms and Ammunition, Netherlands Forensic Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Forensic Science, Interdisciplinary Investigations, Statistics and Knowledge Management, Netherlands Forensic Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands.
J Forensic Sci. 2016 Jan;61 Suppl 1:S102-9. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12895. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
In shooting scene reconstructions, risk assessment of the situation can be important for the legal system. Shooting accuracy and precision, and thus risk assessment, might be correlated with the shooter's physical movement and experience. The hit patterns of inexperienced and experienced shooters, while shooting stationary (10 shots) and in running motion (10 shots) with a semi-automatic pistol, were compared visually (with confidence ellipses) and statistically. The results show a significant difference in precision (circumference of the hit patterns) between stationary shots and shots fired in motion for both inexperienced and experienced shooters. The decrease in precision for all shooters was significantly larger in the y-direction than in the x-direction. The precision of the experienced shooters is overall better than that of the inexperienced shooters. No significant change in accuracy (shift in the hit pattern center) between stationary shots and shots fired in motion can be seen for all shooters.
在枪击场景重建中,对情况进行风险评估对于法律系统可能很重要。射击的准确性和精确性,进而风险评估,可能与射手的身体动作和经验相关。比较了无经验射手和有经验射手在使用半自动手枪进行固定射击(10发)和跑动射击(10发)时的命中模式,采用视觉方法(通过置信椭圆)和统计学方法进行分析。结果表明,对于无经验射手和有经验射手而言,固定射击和跑动射击之间在精确性(命中模式的周长)上存在显著差异。所有射手在y方向上精确性的下降幅度明显大于x方向。有经验射手的精确性总体上优于无经验射手。对于所有射手而言,未观察到固定射击和跑动射击之间在准确性(命中模式中心的偏移)上有显著变化。