Zourdos Michael C, Jo Edward, Khamoui Andy V, Lee Sang-Rok, Park Bong-Sup, Ormsbee Michael J, Panton Lynn B, Contreras Robert J, Kim Jeong-Su
1Department of Exercise Science and Health Promotion, Muscle Physiology Laboratory, Boca Raton, Florida; 2Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, Human Performance Research Laboratory, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, Pomona, California; 3Department of Nutrition, Food, and Exercise Sciences, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida; 4Department of Kinesiology and Dance, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico; and 5College of Arts and Sciences, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Mar;30(3):784-91. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001165.
The primary aim of this study was to compare 2 daily undulating periodization (DUP) models on one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength in the squat, bench press, deadlift, total volume (TV) lifted, and temporal hormone response. Eighteen male, college-aged (21.1 ± 1.9 years) powerlifters participated in this study and were assigned to one of 2 groups: (a) traditional DUP training with a weekly training order: hypertrophy-specific, strength-specific, and power-specific training (HSP, n = 9) or (b) modified DUP training with a weekly training order: hypertrophy-specific, power-specific, and strength-specific training (HPS, n = 9). Both groups trained 3 nonconsecutive days per week for 6 weeks and performed the squat, bench press, and deadlift exercises. During hypertrophy and power sessions, subjects performed a fixed number of sets and repetitions but performed repetitions until failure at a given percentage during strength sessions to compare TV. Testosterone and cortisol were measured at pretesting and posttesting and before each strength-specific day. Hypertrophy, power, and strength produced greater TV in squat and bench press (p ≤ 0.05) than HSP, but not for deadlift (p > 0.05). For squat and deadlift, there was no difference between groups for 1RM (p > 0.05); however, HPS exhibited greater increases in 1RM bench press than HSP (p ≤ 0.05). Effect sizes (ES) showed meaningful differences (ES > 0.50) in favor of HPS for squat and bench press 1RM. Testosterone decreased (p ≤ 0.05) at weeks 5 and 6 and cortisol decline at weeks 3 and 4. However, neither hormone was different at posttesting compared with pretesting (p > 0.05). Our findings suggest that an HPS configuration of DUP has enhanced performance benefits compared with HSP.
本研究的主要目的是比较两种每日波动周期化(DUP)模型对深蹲、卧推、硬拉的一次重复最大值(1RM)力量、总训练量(TV)以及激素的即时反应。18名大学年龄(21.1±1.9岁)的男性力量举运动员参与了本研究,并被分配到2组中的一组:(a)传统DUP训练,每周训练顺序为:肥大特异性、力量特异性和功率特异性训练(HSP,n = 9);或(b)改良DUP训练,每周训练顺序为:肥大特异性、功率特异性和力量特异性训练(HPS,n = 9)。两组均每周训练3天,共6周,进行深蹲、卧推和硬拉练习。在肥大和功率训练阶段,受试者进行固定组数和重复次数,但在力量训练阶段以给定百分比进行重复直至力竭,以比较训练量。在预测试和后测试时以及每个力量特异性训练日之前测量睾酮和皮质醇。肥大、功率和力量训练阶段在深蹲和卧推中产生的训练量比HSP更大(p≤0.05),但硬拉训练量无差异(p>0.05)。对于深蹲和硬拉,两组之间的1RM无差异(p>0.05);然而,HPS在卧推1RM上的增加幅度大于HSP(p≤0.05)。效应量(ES)显示,在深蹲和卧推1RM方面,HPS有显著差异(ES>0.50)。睾酮在第5周和第6周下降(p≤0.05),皮质醇在第3周和第4周下降。然而,与预测试相比,后测试时两种激素均无差异(p>0.05)。我们的研究结果表明,与HSP相比,DUP的HPS配置具有更好的训练效果。