Suppr超能文献

替加环素联合延长输注亚胺培南与舒巴坦联合亚胺培南治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎合并泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌菌血症的临床疗效比较及体外协同试验与临床疗效的相关性分析。

Comparison of the clinical efficacy between tigecycline plus extended-infusion imipenem and sulbactam plus imipenem against ventilator-associated pneumonia with pneumonic extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia, and correlation of clinical efficacy with in vitro synergy tests.

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2016 Dec;49(6):924-933. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To compare the clinical efficacy between salvage antimicrobial regimen consisting of tigecycline plus extended-infusion imipenem/cilastatin (TIC) and regimen of sulbactam plus imipenem/cilastatin (SIC) for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and pneumonic bacteremia due to extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab) isolates, and determine the correlation of results of in vitro tigecycline-imipenem synergy test with clinical efficacy.

METHODS

The comparative survey was conducted at a medical center in Taiwan in 2013. Patients comprising the TIC group (n = 28) received tigecycline plus extended-infusion imipenem/cilastatin following unresponsiveness to 3-day sulbactam-imipenem/cilastatin therapy, and those in the SIC group (n = 56) received sulbactam-imipenem/cilastatin throughout the course. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to explore 30-day case-fatality independent predictors. Additionally, the checkerboard test and time-kill analysis were performed for the bloodstream XDR-Ab isolates from patients in the TIC group, and molecular characterization was done for the bloodstream XDR-Ab strains of all patients.

RESULTS

We found that the TIC scheme has a significant benefit on improving patients' survival status (the mortality rate of TIC and SIC group patients was 14.3% and 64.3%, respectively), corresponding well with in vitro synergy or additivity results by the checkerboard test. Twenty TIC group cases had monomicrobial XDR-Ab cultured from tracheal aspirates after 10 days of tigecycline-imipenem/cilastatin therapy, but none developed subsequent pneumonia. However, breakthrough primary Burkholderia cepacia (n = 3) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1) bacteremias were attributed to four TIC case fatalities. Shock, SIC regimen usage, and development of breakthrough bacteremia were independent predictors of 30-day in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

Although the TIC regimen showed good efficacy, its value regarding managing XDR-Ab ventilator-associated pneumonia bacteremia needs further evaluation.

摘要

背景/目的:比较替加环素联合延长输注亚胺培南/西司他丁(TIC)与舒巴坦联合亚胺培南/西司他丁(SIC) salvage 抗菌方案治疗广泛耐药(XDR)鲍曼不动杆菌(Ab)引起的呼吸机相关性肺炎和肺炎性菌血症的临床疗效,并确定体外替加环素-亚胺培南协同试验结果与临床疗效的相关性。

方法

2013 年在台湾一家医疗中心进行了这项对比调查。TIC 组(n=28)患者在对 3 天舒巴坦-亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗无反应后接受替加环素联合延长输注亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗,SIC 组(n=56)患者则全程接受舒巴坦-亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗。采用单因素和多因素分析方法探讨 30 天病死率的独立预测因素。此外,对 TIC 组患者血流 XDR-Ab 分离株进行棋盘试验和时间杀伤分析,并对所有患者血流 XDR-Ab 菌株进行分子特征分析。

结果

我们发现 TIC 方案显著改善了患者的生存状况(TIC 组和 SIC 组患者的死亡率分别为 14.3%和 64.3%),与棋盘试验的体外协同或相加结果相符。10 天替加环素-亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗后,20 例 TIC 组患者的气管吸出物中培养出单一 XDR-Ab,但无一例随后发生肺炎。然而,有 4 例 TIC 病例死亡归因于突破性原发性伯克霍尔德菌(n=3)和铜绿假单胞菌(n=1)菌血症。休克、SIC 方案的使用以及突破性菌血症的发生是 30 天院内死亡率的独立预测因素。

结论

尽管 TIC 方案显示出良好的疗效,但它在管理 XDR-Ab 呼吸机相关性肺炎菌血症方面的价值仍需进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验