Suppr超能文献

在中国患者中比较布南色林与利培酮治疗精神分裂症的疗效和安全性:一项双盲、平行组多中心随机试验。

Comparative study of the efficacy and safety between blonanserin and risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia in Chinese patients: A double-blind, parallel-group multicenter randomized trial.

作者信息

Li Huafang, Yao Chen, Shi Jianguo, Yang Fude, Qi Shuguang, Wang Lili, Zhang Honggeng, Li Jie, Wang Chuanyue, Wang Chuansheng, Liu Cui, Li Lehua, Wang Qiang, Li Keqing, Luo Xiaoyan, Gu Niufan

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai, 200030, China.

Peking University Clinical Research Institute, Beijing, 100191, China.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Oct;69:102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.07.015. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

Abstract

This randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of blonanserin and risperidone to treat Chinese schizophrenia patients aged ≥18 and < 65 years. Patients with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores ≥70 and ≤ 120 were randomized to receive blonanserin or risperidone using a gradual dose-titration method (blonanserin tablets: 8-24 mg/day; risperidone tablets: 2-6 mg/day), twice daily. Treatment populations consisted of 128 blonanserin-treated patients and 133 risperidone-treated patients. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed using the last observation carried forward method. Reductions of PANSS total scores by blonanserin and risperidone treatment were -30.59 and -33.56, respectively. Risperidone treatment was associated with elevated levels of serum prolactin (67.16% risperidone versus 52.31% blonanserin) and cardiac-related abnormalities (22.39% risperidone versus 12.31% blonanserin), and blonanserin patients were more prone to extrapyramidal side effects (48.46% blonanserin versus 29.10% risperidone). In conclusion, blonanserin was as effective as risperidone for the treatment of Chinese patients with schizophrenia. The overall safety profiles of these drugs are comparable, although blonanserin was associated with a higher incidence of EPS and risperidone was associated with a higher incidence of prolactin elevation and weight gain. Thus, blonanserin is useful for the treatment of Chinese schizophrenia patients.

摘要

这项随机双盲研究比较了布南色林和利培酮治疗年龄≥18岁且<65岁的中国精神分裂症患者的疗效和安全性。阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)总分≥70且≤120的患者采用逐步剂量滴定法随机接受布南色林或利培酮治疗(布南色林片:8 - 24毫克/天;利培酮片:2 - 6毫克/天),每日两次。治疗人群包括128例接受布南色林治疗的患者和133例接受利培酮治疗的患者。采用末次观察结转法进行意向性分析。布南色林和利培酮治疗后PANSS总分的降低分别为-30.59和-33.56。利培酮治疗与血清催乳素水平升高(利培酮组为67.16%,布南色林组为52.31%)和心脏相关异常(利培酮组为22.39%,布南色林组为12.31%)有关,而布南色林组患者更容易出现锥体外系副作用(布南色林组为48.46%,利培酮组为29.10%)。总之,布南色林治疗中国精神分裂症患者的疗效与利培酮相当。这些药物的总体安全性相当,尽管布南色林与锥体外系反应的发生率较高有关,而利培酮与催乳素升高和体重增加的发生率较高有关。因此,布南色林对治疗中国精神分裂症患者有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验