Suppr超能文献

催化破坏与吸附在控制二恶英排放中的比较。

Catalytic destruction vs. adsorption in controlling dioxin emission.

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Central University, 300 Jhong-da Road, Jhongli, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan, Republic of China.

Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Central University, 300 Jhong-da Road, Jhongli, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan, Republic of China.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2015 Dec;46:257-64. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 5.

Abstract

This study investigates the removal efficiencies of PCDD/Fs achieved with a catalytic filter (CF) and with activated carbon injection followed by bag filter (ACI+BF) as applied in an industrial waste incinerator (IWI) and a hazardous waste incinerator (HWI), respectively. Catalytic filtration has been successfully applied to remove PCDD/Fs from gas streams. Comparing the CF to the ACI+BF system, it appears that the PCDD/F removal efficiency achieved with a CF is higher than that of an ACI+BF system. The PCDD/F emissions from both incinerators are well controlled to meet the regulatory limit of 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm(3). Additionally, the PCDD/F concentration in BF ash is higher than the regulation limit of Taiwan (1.0 ng I-TEQ/g). In contrast, the PCDD/F concentration in CF ash is only 0.274 ng I-TEQ/g. The difference is attributed to the fact that the ACI+BF system just transfers PCDD/Fs from gas phase to solid phase and further increases the PCDD/F concentration in fly ash, while CF technology effectively destroys the gas-phase PCDD/Fs. Therefore, the disposal of the fly ash discharged from CF would be less expensive compared with the fly ash discharged from the ACI+BF system. In this study, the PCDD/F emission factors of both incinerators are also established.

摘要

本研究分别考察了在工业废物焚烧炉(IWI)和危险废物焚烧炉(HWI)中应用的催化滤床(CF)和活性炭喷射后再过滤袋(ACI+BF)对 PCDD/Fs 的去除效率。催化过滤已成功应用于去除气流中的 PCDD/Fs。与 ACI+BF 系统相比,CF 对 PCDD/F 的去除效率似乎更高。两个焚烧炉的 PCDD/F 排放均得到有效控制,满足法规规定的 0.1ng I-TEQ/Nm³的限值。此外,BF 灰分中的 PCDD/F 浓度高于台湾地区(1.0ng I-TEQ/g)的规定限值。相比之下,CF 灰分中的 PCDD/F 浓度仅为 0.274ng I-TEQ/g。这是因为 ACI+BF 系统只是将 PCDD/Fs 从气相转移到固相,进一步增加了飞灰中的 PCDD/F 浓度,而 CF 技术则有效地破坏了气相中的 PCDD/Fs。因此,与 ACI+BF 系统排放的飞灰相比,CF 排放的飞灰的处理费用更低。在本研究中,还确定了两个焚烧炉的 PCDD/F 排放因子。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验