Suppr超能文献

模拟尼日利亚HIV血清学不一致夫妇联合预防的影响及成本效益。

Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of combination prevention amongst HIV serodiscordant couples in Nigeria.

作者信息

Mitchell Kate M, Lépine Aurélia, Terris-Prestholt Fern, Torpey Kwasi, Khamofu Hadiza, Folayan Morenike O, Musa Jonah, Anenih James, Sagay Atiene S, Alhassan Emmanuel, Idoko John, Vickerman Peter

机构信息

aLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK bFamily Health International, Abuja cObafemi Awolowo University and New HIV Vaccine and Microbicide Advocacy Society, Lagos dUniversity of Jos, Jos eNational Agency for the Control of AIDS, Abuja, Nigeria fUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

AIDS. 2015 Sep 24;29(15):2035-44. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000798.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the impact and cost-effectiveness of treatment as prevention (TasP), pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and condom promotion for serodiscordant couples in Nigeria.

DESIGN

Mathematical and cost modelling.

METHODS

A deterministic model of HIV-1 transmission within a cohort of serodiscordant couples and to/from external partners was parameterized using data from Nigeria and other African settings. The impact and cost-effectiveness were estimated for condom promotion, PrEP and/or TasP, compared with a baseline where antiretroviral therapy (ART) was offered according to 2010 national guidelines (CD4 <350 cells/μl) to all HIV-positive partners. The impact was additionally compared with a baseline of current ART coverage (35% of those with CD4 <350 cells/μl). Full costs (in US $2012) of programme introduction and implementation were estimated from a provider perspective.

RESULTS

Substantial benefits came from scaling up ART to all HIV-positive partners according to 2010 national guidelines, with additional smaller benefits of providing TasP, PrEP or condom promotion. Compared with a baseline of offering ART to all HIV-positive partners at the 2010 national guidelines, condom promotion was the most cost-effective strategy [US $1206/disability-adjusted-life-year (DALY)], the next most cost-effective intervention was to additionally give TasP to HIV-positive partners (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio US $1607/DALY), followed by additionally giving PrEP to HIV-negative partners until their HIV-positive partners initiate ART (US $7870/DALY). When impact was measured in terms of infections averted, PrEP with condom promotion prevented double the number of infections as condom promotion alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The first priority intervention for serodiscordant couples in Nigeria should be scaled up ART access for HIV-positive partners. Subsequent incremental benefits are greatest with condom promotion and TasP, followed by PrEP.

摘要

目的

评估治疗即预防(TasP)、暴露前预防(PrEP)以及推广使用避孕套对尼日利亚血清学不一致伴侣的影响和成本效益。

设计

数学和成本建模。

方法

利用来自尼日利亚和其他非洲地区的数据,对血清学不一致伴侣群体内部以及与外部性伴之间的HIV-1传播确定性模型进行参数化。与按照2010年国家指南(CD4<350个细胞/微升)为所有HIV阳性伴侣提供抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的基线情况相比,评估推广避孕套使用、PrEP和/或TasP的影响和成本效益。此外,还将影响情况与当前ART覆盖率(CD4<350个细胞/微升者中的35%)的基线进行了比较。从提供者角度估算了项目引入和实施的全部成本(2012年美元)。

结果

按照2010年国家指南为所有HIV阳性伴侣扩大ART治疗带来了显著益处,提供TasP、PrEP或推广避孕套使用还带来了额外的较小益处。与按照2010年国家指南为所有HIV阳性伴侣提供ART的基线相比,推广避孕套使用是最具成本效益的策略[1206美元/伤残调整生命年(DALY)],其次最具成本效益的干预措施是额外为HIV阳性伴侣提供TasP(增量成本效益比为1607美元/DALY),接着是额外为HIV阴性伴侣提供PrEP直至其HIV阳性伴侣开始接受ART治疗(7870美元/DALY)。当以避免感染的数量来衡量影响时,PrEP联合推广避孕套使用预防的感染数量是仅推广避孕套使用的两倍。

结论

尼日利亚血清学不一致伴侣的首要干预措施应是扩大HIV阳性伴侣获得ART治疗的机会。随后,推广避孕套使用和TasP带来的增量效益最大,其次是PrEP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验