Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波疗法与超声疗法对慢性网球肘的镇痛效果比较

Analgesic effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus ultrasound therapy in chronic tennis elbow.

作者信息

Lizis Paweł

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy in Kielce, Holycross College, Poland.

出版信息

J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Aug;27(8):2563-7. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.2563. Epub 2015 Aug 21.

Abstract

[Purpose] This study compared the analgesic effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy with those of ultrasound therapy in patients with chronic tennis elbow. [Subjects] Fifty patients with tennis elbow were randomized to receive extracorporeal shock wave therapy or ultrasound therapy. [Methods] The extracorporeal shock wave therapy group received 5 treatments once per week. Meanwhile, the ultrasound group received 10 treatments 3 times per week. Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale during grip strength evaluation, palpation of the lateral epicondyle, Thomsen test, and chair test. Resting pain was also recorded. The scores were recorded and compared within and between groups pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment. [Results] Intra- and intergroup comparisons immediately and 3 months post-treatment showed extracorporeal shock wave therapy decreased pain to a significantly greater extent than ultrasound therapy. [Conclusion] Extracorporeal shock wave therapy can significantly reduce pain in patients with chronic tennis elbow.

摘要

[目的] 本研究比较了体外冲击波疗法与超声疗法对慢性网球肘患者的镇痛效果。[对象] 50例网球肘患者被随机分为接受体外冲击波疗法组或超声疗法组。[方法] 体外冲击波疗法组每周接受1次,共5次治疗。同时,超声组每周接受3次,共10次治疗。在握力评估、外侧髁触诊、汤姆森试验和椅子试验期间,使用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛。还记录静息痛。在治疗前、治疗后即刻和治疗后3个月记录并比较组内和组间的评分。[结果] 治疗后即刻和3个月时的组内和组间比较显示,体外冲击波疗法比超声疗法能更显著地减轻疼痛。[结论] 体外冲击波疗法可显著减轻慢性网球肘患者的疼痛。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60f8/4563315/ca7d0776e941/jpts-27-2563-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验