Suppr超能文献

用于评估中国艾滋病病毒感染者应对策略的简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)的初步验证。

A preliminary validation of the Brief COPE instrument for assessing coping strategies among people living with HIV in China.

作者信息

Su Xiao-You, Lau Joseph Tf, Mak Winnie Ws, Choi K C, Feng Tie-Jian, Chen Xi, Liu Chu-Liang, Liu Jun, Liu De, Chen Lin, Song Jun-Min, Zhang Yan, Zhao Guang-Lu, Zhu Zhang-Ping, Cheng Jin-Quan

机构信息

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong; CUHK Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Infect Dis Poverty. 2015 Sep 14;4:41. doi: 10.1186/s40249-015-0074-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Brief COPE instrument has been utilized to conduct research on various populations, including people living with HIV (PLWH). However, the questionnaire constructs when applied to PLWH have not been subjected to thorough factor validation.

METHODS

A total of 258 PLWH were recruited from two provinces of China. They answered questions involving the scales of three instruments: the Brief COPE, the Perceived Social Support Scale, and the Perceived Discrimination Scale for PLWH. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted.

RESULTS

The CFA found a poor goodness of fit to the data. The subsequent EFA identified six preliminary factors, forming subscales with Cronbach's alphas, which ranged from 0.61 to 0.80. Significant correlation coefficients between the subscales and measures of perceived social support and perceived discrimination were reported, giving preliminary support to the validity of the new empirical factor structure.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the original factor structure of the Brief COPE instrument, when applied to PLWH in China, did not fit the data. Thus, the Brief COPE should be applied to various populations and cultures with caution. The new factor structure established by the EFA is only preliminary and requires further validation.

摘要

背景

简短应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)已被用于对包括艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)在内的各类人群进行研究。然而,该问卷结构应用于艾滋病毒感染者时,尚未经过全面的因子验证。

方法

从中国两个省份招募了258名艾滋病毒感染者。他们回答了涉及三种问卷量表的问题:简短应对方式问卷、感知社会支持量表和艾滋病毒感染者感知歧视量表。进行了验证性因子分析(CFA)和探索性因子分析(EFA)。

结果

验证性因子分析发现数据拟合度较差。随后的探索性因子分析确定了六个初步因子,形成了信度系数(Cronbach's alphas)在0.61至0.80之间的子量表。报告了子量表与感知社会支持和感知歧视测量之间的显著相关系数,为新的实证因子结构的有效性提供了初步支持。

结论

本研究表明,简短应对方式问卷的原始因子结构应用于中国的艾滋病毒感染者时,与数据不拟合。因此,简短应对方式问卷应用于不同人群和文化时应谨慎。探索性因子分析建立的新因子结构只是初步的,需要进一步验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f91/4570223/9980474d9181/40249_2015_74_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验