Hard D L, McKenzie E A, Cantis D, May J, Sorensen J, Bayes B, Madden E, Wyckoff S, Stone B, Maass J
J Agric Saf Health. 2015 Jul;21(3):173-85. doi: 10.13031/jash.21.11066.
The NIOSH cost-effective roll-over protective structure (CROPS) demonstration project sought to determine whether three prototype roll-over protective structures (ROPS) designed to be retrofitted on Ford 8N, Ford 3000, Ford 4000, and Massey Ferguson 135 tractors could be installed in the field and whether they would be acceptable by the intended end users (farmers). There were a total of 50 CROPS. demonstrators (25 in New York and 25 in Virginia), with 45 observers attending the New York CROPS demonstrations and 36 observers attending the Virginia CROPS demonstrations, for a total of 70 participants in New York and 61 in Virginia. The oldest retrofitted tractors were 77 to 62 years old, while the newest retrofitted tractors were 40 to 37 years old. The most frequently retrofitted tractor in the CROPS demonstration project was a Ford 3000 series tractor (n = 19; 38%), followed by Ford 4000 (n = 11; 22%), Massey Ferguson 135 (n = 11; 22%), and Ford 8N (n = 9; 18%). A major issue of CROPS retrofitting was the rear wheel fenders. The effort involved in disassembling the fenders (removing the old bolts was often faster by cutting them with a torch), modifying the fender mounting brackets, and then reinstalling the fenders with the CROPS generally required the most time. In addition, various other semi-permanent equipment attachments, such as front-end loaders, required additional time and effort to fit with the CROPS. Demonstrators were asked to rank the reasons why they had not retrofitted their tractors with ROPS until they had enrolled in the CROPS demonstration program. ROPS "cost too much" was ranked as the primary reason for participants in both states (80% for New York and 88% for Virginia). The second highest ranked reasons were "ROPS wasn't available" for Virginia (80%) and "hassle to find ROPS" for New York (69%). The third highest ranked reasons were "not enough time to find ROPS" for New York (67%) and "hassle to find ROPS" for Virginia (79%). All demonstrators and observers indicated that they were glad to have participated in the CROPS project.
美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)的经济高效型翻车保护结构(CROPS)示范项目旨在确定三种设计用于改装福特8N、福特3000、福特4000和梅西·弗格森135型拖拉机的翻车保护结构原型能否在田间安装,以及预期的最终用户(农民)是否会接受。CROPS示范产品共有50个(纽约25个,弗吉尼亚25个),纽约的CROPS示范活动有45名观察员参加,弗吉尼亚的CROPS示范活动有36名观察员参加,纽约共有70名参与者,弗吉尼亚有61名。改装的最老的拖拉机有77至62年历史,而最新的改装拖拉机有40至37年历史。CROPS示范项目中改装最频繁的拖拉机是福特3000系列拖拉机(n = 19;38%),其次是福特4000(n = 11;22%)、梅西·弗格森135(n = 11;22%)和福特8N(n = 9;18%)。CROPS改装的一个主要问题是后轮挡泥板。拆卸挡泥板(用火炬切割旧螺栓通常更快)、修改挡泥板安装支架,然后将挡泥板与CROPS一起重新安装所涉及的工作通常需要最多时间。此外,各种其他半永久性设备附件,如前端装载机,需要额外的时间和精力来与CROPS适配。示范者被要求对他们在参加CROPS示范项目之前未用翻车保护结构改装拖拉机的原因进行排名。“成本太高”被列为两个州参与者的主要原因(纽约为80%,弗吉尼亚为88%)。排名第二高的原因在弗吉尼亚是“没有翻车保护结构”(80%),在纽约是“难以找到翻车保护结构”(69%)。排名第三高的原因在纽约是“没有足够时间找到翻车保护结构”(67%),在弗吉尼亚是“难以找到翻车保护结构”(79%)。所有示范者和观察员都表示很高兴参加了CROPS项目。