Suppr超能文献

腹部听诊对肠梗阻的诊断准确性。

Accuracy of abdominal auscultation for bowel obstruction.

作者信息

Breum Birger Michael, Rud Bo, Kirkegaard Thomas, Nordentoft Tyge

机构信息

Birger Michael Breum, Thomas Kirkegaard, Tyge Nordentoft, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology 360, Hvidovre University Hospital, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 14;21(34):10018-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.10018.

Abstract

AIM

To investigate the accuracy and inter-observer variation of bowel sound assessment in patients with clinically suspected bowel obstruction.

METHODS

Bowel sounds were recorded in patients with suspected bowel obstruction using a Littmann(®) Electronic Stethoscope. The recordings were processed to yield 25-s sound sequences in random order on PCs. Observers, recruited from doctors within the department, classified the sound sequences as either normal or pathological. The reference tests for bowel obstruction were intraoperative and endoscopic findings and clinical follow up. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each observer and compared between junior and senior doctors. Interobserver variation was measured using the Kappa statistic.

RESULTS

Bowel sound sequences from 98 patients were assessed by 53 (33 junior and 20 senior) doctors. Laparotomy was performed in 47 patients, 35 of whom had bowel obstruction. Two patients underwent colorectal stenting due to large bowel obstruction. The median sensitivity and specificity was 0.42 (range: 0.19-0.64) and 0.78 (range: 0.35-0.98), respectively. There was no significant difference in accuracy between junior and senior doctors. The median frequency with which doctors classified bowel sounds as abnormal did not differ significantly between patients with and without bowel obstruction (26% vs 23%, P = 0.08). The 53 doctors made up 1378 unique pairs and the median Kappa value was 0.29 (range: -0.15-0.66).

CONCLUSION

Accuracy and inter-observer agreement was generally low. Clinical decisions in patients with possible bowel obstruction should not be based on auscultatory assessment of bowel sounds.

摘要

目的

研究临床疑似肠梗阻患者肠鸣音评估的准确性及观察者间差异。

方法

使用Littmann(®)电子听诊器记录疑似肠梗阻患者的肠鸣音。记录在个人电脑上随机处理,生成25秒的声音序列。从科室医生中招募观察者,将声音序列分类为正常或病理性。肠梗阻的参考检测为术中及内镜检查结果和临床随访。计算每位观察者的敏感性和特异性,并在初级和高级医生之间进行比较。使用Kappa统计量测量观察者间差异。

结果

53名(33名初级和20名高级)医生评估了98例患者的肠鸣音序列。47例患者接受了剖腹手术,其中35例患有肠梗阻。2例患者因大肠梗阻接受了结肠支架置入术。敏感性和特异性的中位数分别为0.42(范围:0.19 - 0.64)和0.78(范围:0.35 - 0.98)。初级和高级医生在准确性上无显著差异。医生将肠鸣音分类为异常的频率中位数在有和没有肠梗阻患者之间无显著差异(26%对23%,P = 0.08)。53名医生组成了1378个独特的配对,Kappa值中位数为0.29(范围: - 0.15 - 0.66)。

结论

准确性和观察者间一致性总体较低。对于可能患有肠梗阻的患者,临床决策不应基于肠鸣音的听诊评估。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of abdominal auscultation for bowel obstruction.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 14;21(34):10018-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.10018.
2
Spectral analysis of bowel sounds in intestinal obstruction using an electronic stethoscope.
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep 7;18(33):4585-92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i33.4585.
3
Usefulness of bowel sound auscultation: a prospective evaluation.
J Surg Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;71(5):768-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
4
How useful are bowel sounds in assessing the abdomen?
Dig Surg. 2010;27(5):422-6. doi: 10.1159/000319372. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
6
Validity and reliability of acoustic analysis of respiratory sounds in infants.
Arch Dis Child. 2004 Nov;89(11):1059-63. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.046458.
7
Digital stethoscopes compared to standard auscultation for detecting abnormal paediatric breath sounds.
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jul;176(7):989-992. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2929-5. Epub 2017 May 16.
8
A visual stethoscope to detect the position of the tracheal tube.
Anesth Analg. 2009 Dec;109(6):1836-42. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bb4967.
9
Physicians' abdominal auscultation. A multi-rater agreement study.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998 Jul;33(7):773-7. doi: 10.1080/00365529850171756.

引用本文的文献

1
Large Bowel Obstruction Secondary to a Fecaloma in a Child With Cerebral Palsy.
Cureus. 2022 Nov 4;14(11):e31078. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31078. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Feeding intolerance.
Early Hum Dev. 2022 Aug;171:105601. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2022.105601. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
4
Automated Bowel Sound Analysis: An Overview.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 5;21(16):5294. doi: 10.3390/s21165294.
5
Imaging Modalities for Evaluation of Intestinal Obstruction.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021 Jul;34(4):205-218. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729737. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
7
Real-time bowel sound analysis using newly developed device in patients undergoing gastric surgery for gastric tumor.
JGH Open. 2021 Feb 26;5(4):454-458. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12515. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Adhesive small bowel obstruction - an update.
Acute Med Surg. 2020 Nov 4;7(1):e587. doi: 10.1002/ams2.587. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
9
Changes in bowel sounds of inpatients undergoing general anesthesia.
Biomed Eng Online. 2020 Jul 30;19(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-00805-z.

本文引用的文献

2
Spectral analysis of bowel sounds in intestinal obstruction using an electronic stethoscope.
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep 7;18(33):4585-92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i33.4585.
3
How useful are bowel sounds in assessing the abdomen?
Dig Surg. 2010;27(5):422-6. doi: 10.1159/000319372. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
4
Acute mechanical bowel obstruction: clinical presentation, etiology, management and outcome.
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan 21;13(3):432-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i3.432.
5
Effect of teaching and type of stethoscope on cardiac auscultatory performance.
Am Heart J. 2006 Jul;152(1):85.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.04.013.
6
A randomized trial comparing electronic and conventional stethoscopes.
Am J Med. 2005 Nov;118(11):1289. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.06.016.
7
Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of pediatric patients with abdominal pain.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Apr;159(4):373-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.4.373.
8
Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review.
JAMA. 2004 Oct 6;292(13):1602-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.13.1602.
9
10
The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Nov;56(11):1129-35. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00177-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验