Thompson D P, Oldham J A, Woby S R
Department of Physiotherapy, The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, North Manchester General Hospital, Crumpsall, Manchester, UK.
Manchester Integrating Medicine and Innovative Technology, University of Manchester, UK.
Physiotherapy. 2016 Jun;102(2):170-7. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
To determine whether adding a physiotherapist-led cognitive-behavioural intervention to an exercise programme improved outcome in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP).
Multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Four outpatient physiotherapy departments.
Fifty-seven patients with CNP. Follow-up data were provided by 39 participants [57% of the progressive neck exercise programme (PNEP) group and 79% of the interactive behavioural modification therapy (IBMT) group].
Twenty-eight subjects were randomised to the PNEP group and 29 subjects were randomised to the IBMT group. IBMT is underpinned by cognitive-behavioural principles, and aims to modify cognitive risk factors through interactive educational sessions, graded exercise and progressive goal setting.
The main outcome measure was disability, measured by the Northwick Park Questionnaire (NPQ). Secondary outcomes were the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Pain Catastrophising Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale (CPSS) and the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire.
No significant between-group differences in disability were observed (mean NPQ change: PNEP=-7.2, IBMT=-10.2). However, larger increases in functional self-efficacy (mean CPSS change: PNEP=1.0, IBMT=3.2) and greater reductions in pain intensity (mean NPRS change: PNEP=-1.0, IBMT=-2.2; P<0.05) and pain-related fear (mean TSK change: PNEP=0.2, IBMT=-4.7, P<0.05) were observed with IBMT. Additionally, a significantly greater proportion of participants made clinically meaningful reductions in pain (25% vs 55%, P<0.05) and disability (25% vs 59%, P<0.05) with IBMT.
The primary outcome did not support the use of cognitive-behavioural physiotherapy in all patients with CNP. However, superior outcomes were observed for several secondary measures, and IBMT may offer additional benefit in some patients.
ISRCTN27611394.
确定在运动方案中加入由物理治疗师主导的认知行为干预是否能改善慢性颈部疼痛(CNP)患者的治疗效果。
多中心随机对照试验。
四个门诊物理治疗科室。
57例CNP患者。39名参与者提供了随访数据[渐进性颈部运动方案(PNEP)组的57%和交互式行为改变疗法(IBMT)组的79%]。
28名受试者被随机分配到PNEP组,29名受试者被随机分配到IBMT组。IBMT以认知行为原则为基础,旨在通过交互式教育课程、分级运动和渐进性目标设定来改变认知风险因素。
主要结局指标是残疾程度,通过诺斯威克公园问卷(NPQ)进行测量。次要结局指标包括数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)、疼痛灾难化量表、坦帕运动恐惧量表(TSK)、慢性疼痛自我效能感量表(CPSS)以及疼痛警觉与意识问卷。
在残疾程度方面未观察到显著的组间差异(NPQ平均变化:PNEP=-7.2,IBMT=-10.2)。然而,观察到IBMT组在功能自我效能感方面有更大的提升(CPSS平均变化:PNEP=1.0,IBMT=3.2),在疼痛强度(NPRS平均变化:PNEP=-1.0,IBMT=-2.2;P<0.05)和与疼痛相关的恐惧(TSK平均变化:PNEP=0.2,IBMT=-4.7,P<0.05)方面有更大幅度的降低。此外,IBMT组有显著更高比例的参与者在疼痛(25%对55%,P<0.05)和残疾程度(25%对59%,P<0.05)方面实现了具有临床意义的降低。
主要结局不支持对所有CNP患者使用认知行为物理治疗。然而,在几个次要指标上观察到了更好的结果,并且IBMT可能对某些患者有额外益处。
ISRCTN27611394。