Zhao Shuo, Uono Shota, Yoshimura Sayaka, Toichi Motomi
Faculty of Human Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Organization for Promoting Developmental Disorder Research, Kyoto, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 22;5:14169. doi: 10.1038/srep14169.
For humans, both eye gaze and arrows serve as powerful signals for orienting attention. Recent studies have shown important differences between gaze and arrows in attention orienting; however, the mechanisms underlying these differences are not known. One such mechanism may be self-referential processing. To investigate this possibility, we trained participants to associate two cues (a red and green arrow in Experiment 1A and two different faces in Experiment 1B) with distinct words ("self" and "other"). Then, we manipulated two types of sound (voice and tone) as targets to investigate whether the cueing effect to self- and other-referential cues differs in a manner similar to that reported for gaze and arrows. We found that self-, but not other-, referential cues induced an enhanced cueing effect to the voice target relative to the tone target regardless of the cue characteristic (i.e., biological or non-biological). Our results suggest that the difference between gaze and arrows in orienting attention can be explained, at least in part, by the self-referentiality of gaze. Furthermore, in Experiment 2, we found a reverse cueing pattern between gaze and arrow cues by manipulating subjects' experiences, suggesting that differences in the self-referentiality of gaze and arrow cues are not inherent.
对于人类而言,目光注视和箭头都是引导注意力的有力信号。最近的研究表明,在注意力引导方面,目光注视和箭头之间存在重要差异;然而,这些差异背后的机制尚不清楚。一种可能的机制或许是自我参照加工。为了探究这种可能性,我们训练参与者将两个线索(实验1A中的红色和绿色箭头以及实验1B中的两张不同面孔)与不同的词语(“自我”和“他人”)建立关联。然后,我们操控两种类型的声音(语音和音调)作为目标,以研究对自我参照和他人参照线索的提示效应是否以类似于目光注视和箭头所报告的方式存在差异。我们发现,无论线索特征(即生物性或非生物性)如何,自我参照线索相对于音调目标对语音目标产生了增强的提示效应,而他人参照线索则不然。我们的结果表明,在引导注意力方面,目光注视和箭头之间的差异至少可以部分地由目光注视的自我参照性来解释。此外,在实验2中,我们通过操控受试者的体验发现了目光注视线索和箭头线索之间相反的提示模式,这表明目光注视线索和箭头线索在自我参照性上的差异并非与生俱来。