Division of Infectious Diseases, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Dec;74(12):2107-16. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207841. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
No consensus has previously been formed regarding the types and presentations of infectious pathogens to be considered as 'opportunistic infections' (OIs) within the setting of biologic therapy. We systematically reviewed published literature reporting OIs in the setting of biologic therapy for inflammatory diseases. The review sought to describe the OI definitions used within these studies and the types of OIs reported. These findings informed a consensus committee (infectious diseases and rheumatology specialists) in deliberations regarding the development of a candidate list of infections that should be considered as OIs in the setting of biologic therapy. We reviewed 368 clinical trials (randomised controlled/long-term extension), 195 observational studies and numerous case reports/series. Only 11 observational studies defined OIs within their methods; no consistent OI definition was identified across studies. Across all study formats, the most numerous OIs reported were granulomatous infections. The consensus group developed a working definition for OIs as 'indicator' infections, defined as specific pathogens or presentations of pathogens that 'indicate' the likelihood of an alteration in host immunity in the setting of biologic therapy. Using this framework, consensus was reached upon a list of OIs and case-definitions for their reporting during clinical trials and other studies. Prior studies of OIs in the setting of biologic therapy have used inconsistent definitions. The consensus committee reached agreement upon an OI definition, developed case definitions for reporting of each pathogen, and recommended these be used in future studies to facilitate comparison of infection risk between biologic therapies.
以前对于在生物治疗背景下应考虑为“机会性感染”(OI)的感染病原体的类型和表现形式尚无共识。我们系统地回顾了报道生物治疗炎症性疾病时 OI 的已发表文献。该综述旨在描述这些研究中使用的 OI 定义以及报告的 OI 类型。这些发现为一个共识委员会(传染病和风湿病专家)提供了信息,供其审议在生物治疗背景下应将哪些感染视为 OI 的候选名单。我们回顾了 368 项临床试验(随机对照/长期扩展)、195 项观察性研究和许多病例报告/系列。只有 11 项观察性研究在其方法中定义了 OI;在研究之间没有发现一致的 OI 定义。在所有研究形式中,报告最多的 OI 是肉芽肿性感染。共识小组将 OI 定义为“指标”感染,定义为在生物治疗背景下“指示”宿主免疫改变可能性的特定病原体或病原体表现。使用该框架,就临床试验和其他研究中报告 OI 和病例定义达成了共识。以前在生物治疗背景下 OI 的研究使用了不一致的定义。共识委员会就 OI 定义达成一致,为每种病原体的报告制定了病例定义,并建议在未来的研究中使用这些定义,以促进生物治疗之间感染风险的比较。