Xu Lei, Mao Xueying, Imrali Ahmet, Syed Ferrial, Mutsvangwa Katherine, Berney Daniel, Cathcart Paul, Hines John, Shamash Jonathan, Lu Yong-Jie
Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 23;10(9):e0138032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138032. eCollection 2015.
Isolation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from peripheral blood has the potential to provide a far easier "liquid biopsy" than tumor tissue biopsies, to monitor tumor cell populations during disease progression and in response to therapies. Many CTC isolation technologies have been developed. We optimized the Parsortix system, an epitope independent, size and compressibility-based platform for CTCs isolation, making it possible to harvest CTCs at the speed and sample volume comparable to standard CellSearch system. We captured more than half of cancer cells from different cancer cell lines spiked in blood samples from healthy donors using this system. Cell loss during immunostaining of cells transferred and fixed on the slides is a major problem for analyzing rare cell samples. We developed a novel cell transfer and fixation method to retain >90% of cells on the slide after the immunofluorescence process without affecting signal strength and specificity. Using this optimized method, we evaluated the Parsortix system for CTC harvest in prostate cancer patients in comparison to immunobead based CTC isolation systems IsoFlux and CellSearch. We harvested a similar number (p = 0.33) of cytokeratin (CK) positive CTCs using Parsortix and IsoFlux from 7.5 mL blood samples of 10 prostate cancer patients (an average of 33.8 and 37.6 respectively). The purity of the CTCs harvested by Parsortix at 3.1% was significantly higher than IsoFlux at 1.0% (p = 0.02). Parsortix harvested significantly more CK positive CTCs than CellSearch (p = 0.04) in seven prostate cancer patient samples, where both systems were utilized (an average of 32.1 and 10.1 respectively). We also captured CTC clusters using Parsortix. Using four-color immunofluorescence we found that 85.8% of PC3 cells expressed EpCAM, 91.7% expressed CK and 2.5% cells lacked both epithelial markers. Interestingly, 95.6% of PC3 cells expressed Vimentin, including those cells that lacked both epithelial marker expression, indicating epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. CK-positive/Vimentin-positive/CD45-negative, and CK-negative/Vimentin-positive/CD45-negative cells were also observed in four of five prostate cancer patients but rarely in three healthy controls, indicating that Parsortix harvests CTCs with both epithelial and mesenchymal features. We also demonstrated using PC3 and DU145 spiking experiment that Parsortix harvested cells were viable for cell culture.
从外周血中分离循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)有可能提供一种比肿瘤组织活检更容易的“液体活检”方法,用于在疾病进展期间和对治疗的反应中监测肿瘤细胞群体。已经开发了许多CTC分离技术。我们优化了Parsortix系统,这是一种基于表位独立、大小和可压缩性的CTC分离平台,使其能够以与标准CellSearch系统相当的速度和样本量收获CTC。使用该系统,我们从健康供体的血样中掺入的不同癌细胞系中捕获了超过一半的癌细胞。在转移并固定在载玻片上的细胞进行免疫染色过程中,细胞损失是分析稀有细胞样本的一个主要问题。我们开发了一种新颖的细胞转移和固定方法,在免疫荧光过程后,能在载玻片上保留>90%的细胞,且不影响信号强度和特异性。使用这种优化方法,我们将Parsortix系统与基于免疫磁珠的CTC分离系统IsoFlux和CellSearch进行比较,评估其在前列腺癌患者中收获CTC的情况。我们从10例前列腺癌患者的7.5 mL血样中,使用Parsortix和IsoFlux收获了数量相似(p = 0.33)的细胞角蛋白(CK)阳性CTC(分别平均为33.8和37.6个)。Parsortix收获的CTC纯度为3.1%,显著高于IsoFlux的1.0%(p = 0.02)。在七个同时使用了这两种系统的前列腺癌患者样本中,Parsortix收获的CK阳性CTC明显多于CellSearch(p = 0.04)(分别平均为32.1和10.1个)。我们还使用Parsortix捕获了CTC簇。通过四色免疫荧光,我们发现85.8%的PC3细胞表达EpCAM,91.7%表达CK,2.5%的细胞两种上皮标志物均缺失。有趣的是,95.6%的PC3细胞表达波形蛋白,包括那些两种上皮标志物表达均缺失的细胞,表明上皮-间质转化。在五例前列腺癌患者中的四例中也观察到了CK阳性/波形蛋白阳性/CD45阴性以及CK阴性/波形蛋白阳性/CD45阴性的细胞,但在三个健康对照中很少见,这表明Parsortix收获的是具有上皮和间质特征但在三个健康对照中很少见,这表明Parsortix收获的是具有上皮和间质特征的CTC。我们还通过PC3和DU145掺入实验证明,Parsortix收获的细胞可用于细胞培养。