Brooks Neon, Goldin-Meadow Susan
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago.
Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;40(7):1831-1849. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12292. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
Previous work has found that guiding problem-solvers' movements can have an immediate effect on their ability to solve a problem. Here we explore these processes in a learning paradigm. We ask whether guiding a learner's movements can have a delayed effect on learning, setting the stage for change that comes about only after instruction. Children were taught movements that were either relevant or irrelevant to solving mathematical equivalence problems and were told to produce the movements on a series of problems before they received instruction in mathematical equivalence. Children in the relevant movement condition improved after instruction significantly more than children in the irrelevant movement condition, despite the fact that the children showed no improvement in their understanding of mathematical equivalence on a ratings task or on a paper-and-pencil test taken immediately after the movements but before instruction. Movements of the body can thus be used to sow the seeds of conceptual change. But those seeds do not necessarily come to fruition until after the learner has received explicit instruction in the concept, suggesting a "sleeper effect" of gesture on learning.
先前的研究发现,引导问题解决者的动作能够对其解决问题的能力产生即时影响。在此,我们在一种学习范式中探究这些过程。我们要问的是,引导学习者的动作是否会对学习产生延迟效应,从而为仅在接受指导后才会出现的变化奠定基础。我们让孩子们学习与解决数学等价问题相关或无关的动作,并要求他们在接受数学等价指导之前,针对一系列问题做出这些动作。尽管孩子们在做出动作后但在接受指导之前,在评分任务或纸笔测试中对数学等价的理解并无提高,但处于相关动作条件下的孩子在接受指导后的进步明显大于处于无关动作条件下的孩子。因此,身体动作可用于播下概念转变的种子。但这些种子不一定会在学习者接受该概念的明确指导之前就结出果实,这表明手势对学习具有“潜伏效应”。