Ford Adriana E S, Graham Hilary, White Piran C L
Environment Department, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Ecohealth. 2015 Dec;12(4):660-71. doi: 10.1007/s10393-015-1041-4. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
The pace and scale of environmental change is undermining the conditions for human health. Yet the environment and human health remain poorly integrated within research, policy and practice. The ecosystem services (ES) approach provides a way of promoting integration via the frameworks used to represent relationships between environment and society in simple visual forms. To assess this potential, we undertook a scoping review of ES frameworks and assessed how each represented seven key dimensions, including ecosystem and human health. Of the 84 ES frameworks identified, the majority did not include human health (62%) or include feedback mechanisms between ecosystems and human health (75%). While ecosystem drivers of human health are included in some ES frameworks, more comprehensive frameworks are required to drive forward research and policy on environmental change and human health.
环境变化的速度和规模正在破坏人类健康的条件。然而,在研究、政策和实践中,环境与人类健康之间的整合程度仍然很低。生态系统服务(ES)方法提供了一种通过以简单直观的形式表示环境与社会之间关系的框架来促进整合的方式。为了评估这种潜力,我们对ES框架进行了范围审查,并评估了每个框架如何体现七个关键维度,包括生态系统和人类健康。在确定的84个ES框架中,大多数没有包括人类健康(62%),或者没有包括生态系统与人类健康之间的反馈机制(75%)。虽然一些ES框架纳入了人类健康的生态系统驱动因素,但需要更全面的框架来推动关于环境变化与人类健康的研究和政策。