Buck Louis Germaine M, Grewal Jagteshwar, Albert Paul S, Sciscione Anthony, Wing Deborah A, Grobman William A, Newman Roger B, Wapner Ronald, D'Alton Mary E, Skupski Daniel, Nageotte Michael P, Ranzini Angela C, Owen John, Chien Edward K, Craigo Sabrina, Hediger Mary L, Kim Sungduk, Zhang Cuilin, Grantz Katherine L
Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):449.e1-449.e41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.032.
Fetal growth is associated with long-term health yet no appropriate standards exist for the early identification of undergrown or overgrown fetuses. We sought to develop contemporary fetal growth standards for 4 self-identified US racial/ethnic groups.
We recruited for prospective follow-up 2334 healthy women with low-risk, singleton pregnancies from 12 community and perinatal centers from July 2009 through January 2013. The cohort comprised: 614 (26%) non-Hispanic whites, 611 (26%) non-Hispanic blacks, 649 (28%) Hispanics, and 460 (20%) Asians. Women were screened at 8w0d to 13w6d for maternal health status associated with presumably normal fetal growth (aged 18-40 years; body mass index 19.0-29.9 kg/m(2); healthy lifestyles and living conditions; low-risk medical and obstetrical history); 92% of recruited women completed the protocol. Women were randomized among 4 ultrasonography schedules for longitudinal fetal measurement using the Voluson E8 (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI). In-person interviews and anthropometric assessments were conducted at each visit; medical records were abstracted. The fetuses of 1737 (74%) women continued to be low risk (uncomplicated pregnancy, absent anomalies) at birth, and their measurements were included in the standards. Racial/ethnic-specific fetal growth curves were estimated using linear mixed models with cubic splines. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) and biometric parameter percentiles (5th, 50th, 95th) were determined for each gestational week and comparisons made by race/ethnicity, with and without adjustment for maternal and sociodemographic factors.
EFW differed significantly by race/ethnicity >20 weeks. Specifically at 39 weeks, the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles were 2790, 3505, and 4402 g for white; 2633, 3336, and 4226 g for Hispanic; 2621, 3270, and 4078 g for Asian; and 2622, 3260, and 4053 g for black women (adjusted global P < .001). For individual parameters, racial/ethnic differences by order of detection were: humerus and femur lengths (10 weeks), abdominal circumference (16 weeks), head circumference (21 weeks), and biparietal diameter (27 weeks). The study-derived standard based solely on the white group erroneously classifies as much as 15% of non-white fetuses as growth restricted (EFW <5th percentile).
Significant differences in fetal growth were found among the 4 groups. Racial/ethnic-specific standards improve the precision in evaluating fetal growth.
胎儿生长与长期健康相关,但目前尚无适用于早期识别生长发育不良或过度生长胎儿的恰当标准。我们试图为4个自我认定的美国种族/族裔群体制定当代胎儿生长标准。
我们从2009年7月至2013年1月期间,在12个社区和围产期中心招募了2334名低风险单胎妊娠的健康女性进行前瞻性随访。该队列包括:614名(26%)非西班牙裔白人、611名(26%)非西班牙裔黑人、649名(28%)西班牙裔和460名(20%)亚洲人。在孕8周0天至13周6天对女性进行筛查,检查与胎儿生长可能正常相关的孕产妇健康状况(年龄18 - 40岁;体重指数19.0 - 29.9 kg/m²;健康的生活方式和生活条件;低风险的内科和产科病史);92%的招募女性完成了研究方案。使用Voluson E8(通用电气医疗集团,威斯康星州密尔沃基)超声仪,将女性随机分配到4种超声检查时间表中进行胎儿纵向测量。每次访视时进行面对面访谈和人体测量评估;提取医疗记录。1737名(74%)女性的胎儿在出生时仍为低风险(无并发症妊娠,无异常),其测量数据被纳入标准。使用带有三次样条的线性混合模型估计种族/族裔特异性胎儿生长曲线。确定每个孕周的估计胎儿体重(EFW)和生物测量参数百分位数(第5、50、95百分位数),并按种族/族裔进行比较,同时对孕产妇和社会人口学因素进行调整和未调整的比较。
孕周>20周时,EFW在种族/族裔之间存在显著差异。具体在孕39周时,白人的第5、50和95百分位数分别为2790、3505和4402 g;西班牙裔为2633、3336和4226 g;亚洲人为2621、3270和4078 g;黑人为2622、3260和4053 g(调整后的总体P <.001)。对于单个参数,按检测顺序的种族/族裔差异为:肱骨和股骨长度(10周)、腹围(16周)、头围(21周)和双顶径(27周)。仅基于白人组得出的研究标准会错误地将多达15%的非白人胎儿归类为生长受限(EFW <第5百分位数)。
在这4个群体中发现了胎儿生长的显著差异。种族/族裔特异性标准提高了评估胎儿生长的准确性。