Al-Majzoub Omar, Rybak Eva, Reardon David P, Krause Patricia, Connors Jean M
Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; The Medicines Company, Parsippany, New Jersey.
J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;50(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.07.024.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently approved a four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4-PCC) for warfarin reversal. The literature supporting its use over three-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (3-PCC) is limited.
Our objective was to retrospectively compare the efficacy of 3-PCC to 4-PCC in reversing warfarin in patients who were actively bleeding.
We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort analysis of adult patients who received 3-PCC or 4-PCC for international normalized ratio (INR) reversal. Our study excluded patients not actively bleeding and not on warfarin. The main outcome was the percentage of patients who achieved warfarin reversal defined as INR ≤ 1.3 at first INR check post factor administration. We recorded baseline data including PCC dose, location of bleed, pre- and posttreatment INR, and time to INR reversal.
We included a total of 53 patients. Intracranial hemorrhage was the most common site of bleeding (26 [74.3%] in 3-PCC vs. 12 [66.7%] in 4-PCC). The mean dose of 3-PCC was 25.5 units/kg, compared to 27.9 units/kg of 4-PCC. The mean baseline INR was 2.3 in the 3-PCC group and 3 in the 4-PCC group (p = 0.03), and the first posttreatment INRs were 1.4 and 1.2, respectively (p < 0.01). Warfarin reversal was achieved in 15 (42.9%) patients who received 3-PCC and 15 (83.3%) patients who received 4-PCC (p < 0.01). Faster time to INR reversal was noted in the 4-PCC group vs. the 3-PCC group (3.7 vs. 5 h, p = 0.48).
A higher percentage of patients achieved warfarin reversal with 4-PCC compared to 3-PCC treatment. A prospective randomized control trial is necessary to confirm our results.
美国食品药品监督管理局最近批准了一种四因子凝血酶原复合物浓缩剂(4-PCC)用于华法林逆转。支持其优于三因子凝血酶原复合物浓缩剂(3-PCC)使用的文献有限。
我们的目的是回顾性比较3-PCC和4-PCC在逆转活动性出血患者华法林方面的疗效。
我们对接受3-PCC或4-PCC以逆转国际标准化比值(INR)的成年患者进行了单中心回顾性队列分析。我们的研究排除了非活动性出血且未服用华法林的患者。主要结局是在给予凝血因子后首次INR检查时达到华法林逆转(定义为INR≤1.3)的患者百分比。我们记录了基线数据,包括PCC剂量、出血部位、治疗前后的INR以及INR逆转时间。
我们共纳入了53例患者。颅内出血是最常见的出血部位(3-PCC组26例[74.3%],4-PCC组12例[66.7%])。3-PCC的平均剂量为25.5单位/千克,而4-PCC为27.9单位/千克。3-PCC组的平均基线INR为2.3,4-PCC组为3(p = 0.03),治疗后的首次INR分别为1.4和1.2(p < 0.01)。接受3-PCC的患者中有15例(42.9%)实现了华法林逆转,接受4-PCC的患者中有15例(83.3%)实现了华法林逆转(p < 0.01)。4-PCC组的INR逆转时间比3-PCC组更快(3.7小时对5小时,p = 0.48)。
与3-PCC治疗相比,4-PCC治疗使更多患者实现了华法林逆转。需要进行前瞻性随机对照试验来证实我们的结果。