Keene Toby, Brearley Matt, Bowen Beth, Walker Anthony
1Australian Capital Territory Ambulance Service,Quality, Safety, and Risk Unit,Canberra,Australia.
3National Critical Care and Trauma Response Centre,Disaster Medicine Research,Darwin,Australia.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Oct;30(5):461-5. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15005038.
In the course of their duties, firefighters risk heat stroke and other medical conditions due to exertion in high-temperature environments. Infrared tympanic temperature measurement (TTym) is often used by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to assess the core body temperature of firefighters. The accuracy of TTym in this setting has been called into question. Hypothesis/Problem This study aimed to examine the accuracy of TTym for core body temperature assessment at emergency firefighting events compared with gastrointestinal temperature measurement (TGI) as measured by ingestible thermometers.
Forty-five (42 male, three female) professional urban firefighters from an Australian fire service completed two 20-minute work periods in a 100°C (± 5°C) heat chamber while wearing personal protective clothing (PPC) and breathing apparatus (weighing approximately 22 kg). Measurements were taken immediately before entering, and on exiting, the heat chamber. Tympanic temperature was assessed by an infrared tympanic thermometer and TGI was measured by ingestible sensor and radio receiver.
Complete data were available for 37 participants. Participant temperatures were higher on exiting the heat chamber than at baseline (TTym: 35.9°C (SD=0.7) vs 37.5°C (SD=0.8); TGI: 37.2°C (SD=0.4) vs 38.6°C (SD=0.5)). Tympanic temperature underestimated TGI on average by 1.3°C (SD=0.5) before entering the chamber and by 1.0°C (SD=0.8) following the exercise. Using pooled data, the average underestimation was 1.2°C (SD=0.7).
Tympanic thermometers cause an unreliable measure of core body temperature for firefighters engaged in fire suppression activities. Accurate and practical measures of core body temperature are required urgently.
在履行职责过程中,消防员因在高温环境中劳作而面临中暑及其他健康问题的风险。紧急医疗服务(EMS)经常使用红外鼓膜温度测量(TTym)来评估消防员的核心体温。在这种情况下,TTym的准确性受到了质疑。假设/问题 本研究旨在探讨与通过可摄入温度计测量的胃肠道温度(TGI)相比,TTym在紧急灭火事件中评估核心体温的准确性。
来自澳大利亚消防部门的45名(42名男性,3名女性)职业城市消防员,在穿着个人防护装备(PPC)和呼吸设备(约重22公斤)的情况下,于100°C(±5°C)的热室中完成两个20分钟的工作时段。在进入热室之前和离开热室时立即进行测量。通过红外鼓膜温度计评估鼓膜温度,通过可摄入传感器和无线电接收器测量TGI。
37名参与者有完整数据。参与者离开热室时的体温高于基线(TTym:35.9°C(标准差=0.7)对37.5°C(标准差=0.8);TGI:37.2°C(标准差=0.4)对38.6°C(标准差=0.5))。进入热室前,鼓膜温度平均低估TGI 1.3°C(标准差=0.5),运动后低估1.0°C(标准差=0.8)。使用汇总数据,平均低估为1.2°C(标准差=0.7)。
对于从事灭火活动中的消防员,鼓膜温度计对核心体温的测量不可靠。迫切需要准确且实用的核心体温测量方法。