Goss Cheryl, Avecilla Scott T, Garbaini Jennifer, Degtyaryova Diana, Lo Dian, Chang Dustin Y M, Cushing Melissa
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical College.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Transfusion. 2016 Feb;56(2):334-8. doi: 10.1111/trf.13380. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
New alloantibody formation is unpredictable in patients who have been previously alloimmunized. Pretransfusion testing is designed to detect these antibodies while antibody identification (ABI) techniques are designed to identify the specificity of the antibody. Pretransfusion testing intervals are prescribed by regulatory and accrediting agencies, intervals for ABI in alloimmunized patients are not. Our institution evaluated the safety of increasing the interval from every 72 hours to 14 days. The current 72-hour interval was chosen at our institution to align with AABB Standard 5.14.3.2, which requires a pretransfusion specimen drawn within 3 days of the scheduled transfusion for potentially immunized patients.
Over 2 years, all ABI entries in the laboratory information system were screened. All cases of alloimmunized patients with an additional antibody specificity that developed within 14 days of a previous ABI were reviewed and confirmed by four transfusion medicine physicians.
Initially, 8948 entries were screened. Thirty patients were identified to have formed 33 newly identified clinically significant alloantibodies within 14 days. After further categorization, only 13 antibodies (0.15% of all ABIs, 0.47% of alloimmunized patients examined) were deemed to be newly formed clinically significant antibodies that would have led to a change in transfusion practice.
Retrospective analysis of ABI results over a 2-year period revealed that 0.47% of previously alloimmunized patients that have samples for pretransfusion testing develop a new clinically significant alloantibody in 14 days or less. While there would be significant resource advantages to increasing the duration between repeat ABI, it does not outweigh the risk of a potential hemolytic transfusion reaction.
既往已发生同种免疫的患者中,新的同种抗体形成情况不可预测。输血前检测旨在检测这些抗体,而抗体鉴定(ABI)技术旨在确定抗体的特异性。输血前检测的间隔时间由监管和认证机构规定,但同种免疫患者的ABI间隔时间并无规定。我们机构评估了将间隔时间从每72小时延长至14天的安全性。我们机构选择当前72小时的间隔时间是为了符合AABB标准5.14.3.2,该标准要求为可能已免疫的患者在预定输血前3天内采集输血前样本。
在2年多的时间里,对实验室信息系统中的所有ABI记录进行了筛查。对所有在先前ABI检测后14天内出现额外抗体特异性的同种免疫患者病例进行了回顾,并由四位输血医学医生进行了确认。
最初,筛查了8948条记录。30名患者被确定在14天内形成了33种新发现的具有临床意义的同种抗体。进一步分类后,只有13种抗体(占所有ABI的0.15%,占接受检查的同种免疫患者的0.47%)被认为是新形成的具有临床意义的抗体,这些抗体可能会导致输血实践的改变。
对2年期间ABI结果的回顾性分析显示,在接受输血前检测的既往同种免疫患者中,有0.47%在14天或更短时间内产生了新的具有临床意义的同种抗体。虽然延长重复ABI之间的时间间隔在资源方面有显著优势,但这并不超过潜在溶血性输血反应的风险。