Suppr超能文献

屋尘螨舌下免疫治疗在轻中度持续性哮喘患者中是安全的:一项临床试验。

House dust mite sublingual immunotherapy is safe in patients with mild-to-moderate, persistent asthma: a clinical trial.

机构信息

UPRES EA 220, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.

Stallergenes SA, Antony, France.

出版信息

Allergy. 2016 Feb;71(2):249-57. doi: 10.1111/all.12791. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The safety of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) in asthma has not always been sufficiently documented; accordingly, fear of asthma exacerbations has made physicians somewhat reluctant to prescribe AIT in this context. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, house dust mite (HDM) sublingual AIT was found to be efficacious in moderate, persistent asthma. The trial's safety results are now reported in detail.

METHODS

Asthmatic adults were randomized 2 : 1 to twelve months of daily treatment with a sublingual solution of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae extracts or a placebo. Adverse events (AEs) at least possibly related to the investigational product were classified by the investigators as adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

RESULTS

Overall, the patients in the safety analysis set (n = 484; active treatment: n = 322; placebo: n = 162) had mostly well-controlled, persistent asthma [mild in 290 patients (59.9%), moderate in 183 (37.8%) and severe in 11 (2.3%)]. No treatment-related serious AEs were reported. A total of 87.0% and 75.9% of the patients in the active and placebo groups, respectively, experienced at least one AE (mostly mild), and 78.9% and 48.1% experienced an ADR (mostly mild or moderate oral reactions). The incidence of asthma exacerbations (symptoms requiring a short course of oral corticosteroids) during the study was similar in the active treatment group (3.7%) and the placebo group (4.3%). There were no significant intergroup differences or intragroup changes over time in respiratory AEs, lung function or asthma-related quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

HDM sublingual AIT was safe and well tolerated in adult patients with mild-to-moderate, persistent asthma (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00660452).

摘要

背景

变应原免疫疗法(AIT)在哮喘中的安全性并非始终得到充分证实;因此,医生对这种情况下使用 AIT 存在顾虑,担心哮喘加重。在一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验中,屋尘螨(HDM)舌下 AIT 对中重度持续性哮喘有效。现将该试验的安全性结果详细报告如下。

方法

将哮喘成年患者随机分为两组,2:1 接受为期 12 个月的每日舌下滴注尘螨变应原提取物或安慰剂治疗。研究者将至少可能与研究药物相关的不良事件(AE)分类为药物不良反应(ADR)。

结果

总体而言,安全性分析集(n=484;治疗组:n=322;安慰剂组:n=162)中的患者大多哮喘控制良好,持续存在[轻度 290 例(59.9%),中度 183 例(37.8%),重度 11 例(2.3%)]。未报告与治疗相关的严重 AE。治疗组和安慰剂组分别有 87.0%和 75.9%的患者至少发生 1 次 AE(大多为轻度),78.9%和 48.1%的患者发生 ADR(大多为轻度或中度口腔反应)。研究期间,治疗组(3.7%)和安慰剂组(4.3%)的哮喘加重(需要短期口服皮质类固醇治疗的症状)发生率相似。两组间或组内随时间变化,在呼吸道 AE、肺功能或哮喘相关生活质量方面均无显著差异。

结论

HDM 舌下 AIT 对轻至中度持续性哮喘的成年患者安全且耐受良好(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00660452)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验