a Aalborg University Copenhagen.
b University of Manchester.
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(10):28-38. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1074303.
In an analysis of recent work on nudging we distinguish three positions on the relationship between nudging founded in libertarian paternalism and the protection of personal autonomy through informed consent. We argue that all three positions fail to provide adequate protection of personal autonomy in the clinical context. Acknowledging that nudging may be beneficial, we suggest a fourth position according to which nudging and informed consent are valuable in different domains of interaction.
在对最近关于助推的研究进行分析时,我们区分了在助推所基于的自由意志家长主义与通过知情同意保护个人自主权之间的关系问题上的三种立场。我们认为,这三种立场都未能为临床环境中的个人自主权提供充分的保护。我们承认助推可能是有益的,因此根据这一观点,我们提出了第四种立场,即助推和知情同意在不同的互动领域具有价值。