School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Monash University, Monash, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Animals (Basel). 2011 Jan 26;1(1):144-60. doi: 10.3390/ani1010144.
This paper reviews current findings in the human aggression and antisocial behaviour literature and those in the animal abuse literature with the aim of highlighting the overlap in conceptualisation. The major aim of this review is to highlight that the co-occurrence between animal abuse behaviours and aggression and violence toward humans can be logically understood through examination of the research evidence for antisocial and aggressive behaviour. From examination through this framework, it is not at all surprising that the two co-occur. Indeed, it would be surprising if they did not. Animal abuse is one expression of antisocial behaviour. What is also known from the extensive antisocial behaviour literature is that antisocial behaviours co-occur such that the presence of one form of antisocial behaviour is highly predictive of the presence of other antisocial behaviours. From such a framework, it becomes evident that animal abuse should be considered an important indicator of antisocial behaviour and violence as are other aggressive and antisocial behaviours. The implications of such a stance are that law enforcement, health and other professionals should not minimize the presence of animal abuse in their law enforcement, prevention, and treatment decisions.
本文回顾了人类攻击和反社会行为文献以及动物虐待文献中的现有发现,旨在强调概念化方面的重叠。本综述的主要目的是强调,通过检查反社会和攻击行为的研究证据,可以从逻辑上理解动物虐待行为与对人类的攻击和暴力之间的共同发生。通过这个框架进行检查,两者共同发生并不奇怪。事实上,如果它们不共同发生,那才令人惊讶。动物虐待是反社会行为的一种表现。从广泛的反社会行为文献中还可知,反社会行为共同发生,以至于一种形式的反社会行为的存在高度预测其他反社会行为的存在。从这样的框架中可以明显看出,动物虐待应该被视为反社会行为和暴力的一个重要指标,就像其他攻击和反社会行为一样。这种立场的影响是,执法、卫生和其他专业人员在执法、预防和治疗决策中不应低估动物虐待的存在。