Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research, University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Feb;4(2):136-47. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00377-0. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
Potassium depletion by thiazide diuretics is associated with a rise in blood glucose. We assessed whether addition or substitution of a potassium-sparing diuretic, amiloride, to treatment with a thiazide can prevent glucose intolerance and improve blood pressure control.
We did a parallel-group, randomised, double-blind trial in 11 secondary and two primary care sites in the UK. Eligible patients were aged 18-80 years; had clinic systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg or higher and home systolic blood pressure of 130 mmHg or higher on permitted background drugs of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, β blockers, calcium-channel blockers, or direct renin inhibitors (previously untreated patients were also eligible in specific circumstances); and had at least one component of the metabolic syndrome in addition to hypertension. Patients with known diabetes were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 24 weeks of daily oral treatment with starting doses of 10 mg amiloride, 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide, or 5 mg amiloride plus 12·5 mg hydrochlorothiazide; all doses were doubled after 12 weeks. Random assignment was done via a central computer system. Both participants and investigators were masked to assignment. Our hierarchical primary endpoints, assessed on a modified intention-to-treat basis at 12 and 24 weeks, were the differences from baseline in blood glucose measured 2 h after a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), compared first between the hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride groups, and then between the hydrochlorothiazide and combination groups. A key secondary endpoint was change in home systolic blood pressure at 12 and 24 weeks. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00797862, and the MHRA, Eudract number 2009-010068-41, and is now complete.
Between Nov 18, 2009, and Dec 15, 2014, 145 patients were randomly assigned to amiloride, 146 to hydrochlorothiazide, and 150 to the combination group. 132 participants in the amiloride group, 134 in the hydrochlorothiazide group, and 133 in the combination group were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. 2 h glucose concentrations after OGTT, averaged at 12 and 24 weeks, were significantly lower in the amiloride group than in the hydrochlorothiazide group (mean difference -0·55 mmol/L [95% CI -0·96 to -0·14]; p=0·0093) and in the combination group than in the hydrochlorothiazide group (-0·42 mmol/L [-0·84 to -0·004]; p=0·048). The mean reduction in home systolic blood pressure during 24 weeks did not differ significantly between the amiloride and hydrochlorothiazide groups, but the fall in blood pressure in the combination group was significantly greater than that in the hydrochlorothiazide group (p=0·0068). Hyperkalaemia was reported in seven (4·8%) patients in the amiloride group and three (2·3%) patients in the combination group; the highest recorded potassium concentration was 5·8 mmol/L in a patient in the amiloride group. 13 serious adverse events occurred but the frequency did not differ significantly between groups.
The combination of amiloride with hydrochlorothiazide, at doses equipotent on blood pressure, prevents glucose intolerance and improves control of blood pressure compared with montherapy with either drug. These findings, together with previous data about morbidity and mortality for the combination, support first-line use of amiloride plus hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients who need treatment with a diuretic.
British Heart Foundation and National Institute for Health Research.
噻嗪类利尿剂引起的钾耗竭与血糖升高有关。我们评估了在噻嗪类药物治疗的基础上加用或替换保钾利尿剂阿米洛利是否可以预防葡萄糖耐量异常并改善血压控制。
我们在英国的 11 个二级和 2 个初级保健站点进行了一项平行组、随机、双盲试验。符合条件的患者年龄在 18-80 岁之间;在允许的背景药物(血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂或直接肾素抑制剂)下,诊室收缩压为 140mmHg 或更高,家庭收缩压为 130mmHg 或更高;此外,除高血压外,还至少有一项代谢综合征的组成部分。已知患有糖尿病的患者被排除在外。患者被随机分配(1:1:1)接受为期 24 周的每日口服治疗,起始剂量为 10mg 阿米洛利、25mg 氢氯噻嗪或 5mg 阿米洛利加 12.5mg 氢氯噻嗪;所有剂量在 12 周后加倍。随机分配通过中央计算机系统进行。参与者和研究人员均对分配情况进行了盲法处理。我们的分层主要终点是在 12 周和 24 周时与基线相比,75g 口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)后 2 小时血糖的差异,首先比较氢氯噻嗪组和阿米洛利组,然后比较氢氯噻嗪组和联合组。关键次要终点是 12 周和 24 周时家庭收缩压的变化。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00797862,在 MHRA 注册,编号为 Eudract number 2009-010068-41,现已完成。
在 2009 年 11 月 18 日至 2014 年 12 月 15 日之间,共有 145 名患者被随机分配至阿米洛利组、146 名患者被随机分配至氢氯噻嗪组、150 名患者被随机分配至联合组。在阿米洛利组、氢氯噻嗪组和联合组中,分别有 132 名、134 名和 133 名参与者纳入了改良意向治疗分析。在 12 周和 24 周时,OGTT 后 2 小时的血糖浓度,平均在阿米洛利组中显著低于氢氯噻嗪组(平均差值-0.55mmol/L [95%CI -0.96 至 -0.14];p=0.0093)和联合组(-0.42mmol/L [-0.84 至 -0.004];p=0.048)。在 24 周期间,家庭收缩压的平均下降在阿米洛利组和氢氯噻嗪组之间没有显著差异,但联合组的血压下降明显大于氢氯噻嗪组(p=0.0068)。阿米洛利组有 7 名(4.8%)患者和联合组有 3 名(2.3%)患者报告出现高钾血症;在阿米洛利组中,一名患者的最高记录钾浓度为 5.8mmol/L。共发生 13 例严重不良事件,但各组之间的频率无显著差异。
在血压方面具有等效降压作用的阿米洛利与氢氯噻嗪联合应用,可预防葡萄糖耐量异常并改善血压控制,与单药治疗相比。这些发现,加上先前关于联合用药的发病率和死亡率的数据,支持在需要利尿剂治疗的高血压患者中一线使用阿米洛利加氢氯噻嗪。
英国心脏基金会和英国国家卫生研究院。