Withofs Nadia, Martinive Philippe, Vanderick Jean, Bletard Noëlla, Scagnol Irène, Mievis Frédéric, Giacomelli Fabrice, Coucke Philippe, Delvenne Philippe, Cataldo Didier, Gambhir Sanjiv S, Hustinx Roland
Department of Medical Physics, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, B35 Domaine universitaire du Sart Tilman, 4000, Liege, Belgium.
Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medical Physics, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Apr;43(4):654-62. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3219-y. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
Our primary objective was to determine if [(18)F]FPRGD2 PET/CT performed at baseline and/or after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) could predict tumour regression grade (TRG) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Secondary objectives were to compare baseline [(18)F]FPRGD2 and [(18)F]FDG uptake, to evaluate the correlation between posttreatment [(18)F]FPRGD2 uptake and tumour microvessel density (MVD) and to determine if [(18)F]FPRGD2 and FDG PET/CT could predict disease-free survival.
Baseline [(18)F]FPRGD2 and FDG PET/CT were performed in 32 consecutive patients (23 men, 9 women; mean age 63 ± 8 years) with LARC before starting any therapy. A posttreatment [(18)F]FPRGD2 PET/CT scan was performed in 24 patients after the end of CRT (median interval 7 weeks, range 3 - 15 weeks) and before surgery (median interval 4 days, range 1 - 15 days).
All LARC showed uptake of both [(18)F]FPRGD2 (SUVmax 5.4 ± 1.5, range 2.7 - 9) and FDG (SUVmax 16.5 ± 8, range 7.1 - 36.5). There was a moderate positive correlation between [(18)F]FPRGD2 and FDG SUVmax (Pearson's r = 0.49, p = 0.0026). There was a moderate negative correlation between baseline [(18)F]FPRGD2 SUVmax and the TRG (Spearman's r = -0.37, p = 0.037), and a [(18)F]FPRGD2 SUVmax of >5.6 identified all patients with a complete response (TRG 0; AUC 0.84, 95 % CI 0.68 - 1, p = 0.029). In the 24 patients who underwent a posttreatment [(18)F]FPRGD2 PET/CT scan the response index, calculated as [(SUVmax1 - SUVmax2)/SUVmax1] × 100 %, was not associated with TRG. Post-treatment [(18)F]FPRGD2 uptake was not correlated with tumour MVD. Neither [(18)F]FPRGD2 nor FDG uptake predicted disease-free survival.
Baseline [(18)F]FPRGD2 uptake was correlated with the pathological response in patients with LARC treated with CRT. However, the specificity was too low to consider its clinical routine use.
我们的主要目标是确定在基线时和/或放化疗(CRT)后进行的[(18)F]FPRGD2 PET/CT是否能够预测局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的肿瘤退缩分级(TRG)。次要目标是比较基线时[(18)F]FPRGD2和[(18)F]FDG摄取情况,评估治疗后[(18)F]FPRGD2摄取与肿瘤微血管密度(MVD)之间的相关性,并确定[(18)F]FPRGD2和FDG PET/CT是否能够预测无病生存期。
在32例连续的LARC患者(23例男性,9例女性;平均年龄63±8岁)开始任何治疗前进行了基线[(18)F]FPRGD2和FDG PET/CT检查。24例患者在CRT结束后(中位间隔7周,范围3 - 15周)且手术前(中位间隔4天,范围1 - 15天)进行了治疗后[(18)F]FPRGD2 PET/CT扫描。
所有LARC均显示[(18)F]FPRGD2(SUVmax 5.4±1.5,范围2.7 - 9)和FDG(SUVmax 16.5±8,范围7.1 - 36.5)摄取。[(18)F]FPRGD2与FDG SUVmax之间存在中度正相关(Pearson相关系数r = 0.49,p = 0.0026)。基线[(18)F]FPRGD2 SUVmax与TRG之间存在中度负相关(Spearman相关系数r = -0.37,p = 0.037),[(18)F]FPRGD2 SUVmax > 5.6可识别出所有完全缓解的患者(TRG 0;AUC 0.84,95% CI 0.68 - 1,p = 0.029)。在24例接受治疗后[(18)F]FPRGD2 PET/CT扫描的患者中,以[(SUVmax1 - SUVmax2)/SUVmax1]×100%计算的反应指数与TRG无关。治疗后[(18)F]FPRGD2摄取与肿瘤MVD无相关性。[(18)F]FPRGD2和FDG摄取均不能预测无病生存期。
基线[(18)F]FPRGD2摄取与接受CRT治疗的LARC患者的病理反应相关。然而,其特异性过低,无法考虑将其用于临床常规应用。