Guderian Sebastian, Dzieciol Anna M, Gadian David G, Jentschke Sebastian, Doeller Christian F, Burgess Neil, Mishkin Mortimer, Vargha-Khadem Faraneh
Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892,
Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychiatry Section, University College London Institute of Child Health, and Great Ormond Street Hospital, London WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 21;35(42):14123-31. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0801-15.2015.
The extent to which navigational spatial memory depends on hippocampal integrity in humans is not well documented. We investigated allocentric spatial recall using a virtual environment in a group of patients with severe hippocampal damage (SHD), a group of patients with "moderate" hippocampal damage (MHD), and a normal control group. Through four learning blocks with feedback, participants learned the target locations of four different objects in a circular arena. Distal cues were present throughout the experiment to provide orientation. A circular boundary as well as an intra-arena landmark provided spatial reference frames. During a subsequent test phase, recall of all four objects was tested with only the boundary or the landmark being present. Patients with SHD were impaired in both phases of this task. Across groups, performance on both types of spatial recall was highly correlated with memory quotient (MQ), but not with intelligence quotient (IQ), age, or sex. However, both measures of spatial recall separated experimental groups beyond what would be expected based on MQ, a widely used measure of general memory function. Boundary-based and landmark-based spatial recall were both strongly related to bilateral hippocampal volumes, but not to volumes of the thalamus, putamen, pallidum, nucleus accumbens, or caudate nucleus. The results show that boundary-based and landmark-based allocentric spatial recall are similarly impaired in patients with SHD, that both types of recall are impaired beyond that predicted by MQ, and that recall deficits are best explained by a reduction in bilateral hippocampal volumes.
In humans, bilateral hippocampal atrophy can lead to profound impairments in episodic memory. Across species, perhaps the most well-established contribution of the hippocampus to memory is not to episodic memory generally but to allocentric spatial memory. However, the extent to which navigational spatial memory depends on hippocampal integrity in humans is not well documented. We investigated spatial recall using a virtual environment in two groups of patients with hippocampal damage (moderate/severe) and a normal control group. The results showed that patients with severe hippocampal damage are impaired in learning and recalling allocentric spatial information. Furthermore, hippocampal volume reduction impaired allocentric navigation beyond what can be predicted by memory quotient as a widely used measure of general memory function.
导航空间记忆在多大程度上依赖于人类海马体的完整性,目前尚无充分的文献记载。我们使用虚拟环境对一组重度海马体损伤(SHD)患者、一组“中度”海马体损伤(MHD)患者和一个正常对照组进行了以自我为中心的空间回忆研究。通过四个带有反馈的学习阶段,参与者在一个圆形场地中学习了四个不同物体的目标位置。在整个实验过程中都有远处线索提供方向。一个圆形边界以及场地内的一个地标提供了空间参考框架。在随后的测试阶段,仅在边界或地标存在的情况下对所有四个物体的回忆进行测试。SHD患者在这项任务的两个阶段都表现受损。在所有组中,两种类型的空间回忆表现都与记忆商数(MQ)高度相关,但与智商(IQ)、年龄或性别无关。然而,两种空间回忆测量方法能够区分实验组,其程度超出了基于MQ(一种广泛使用的一般记忆功能测量方法)的预期。基于边界和基于地标的空间回忆都与双侧海马体体积密切相关,但与丘脑、壳核、苍白球、伏隔核或尾状核的体积无关。结果表明,SHD患者基于边界和基于地标的以自我为中心的空间回忆同样受损,两种类型的回忆受损程度都超出了MQ预测的范围,并且回忆缺陷最好用双侧海马体体积减少来解释。
在人类中,双侧海马体萎缩会导致情景记忆严重受损。在所有物种中,海马体对记忆最确定的贡献可能不是一般的情景记忆,而是以自我为中心的空间记忆。然而,导航空间记忆在多大程度上依赖于人类海马体的完整性,目前尚无充分的文献记载。我们使用虚拟环境对两组海马体损伤(中度/重度)患者和一个正常对照组进行了空间回忆研究。结果表明,重度海马体损伤患者在学习和回忆以自我为中心的空间信息方面存在障碍。此外,海马体体积减少导致的以自我为中心的导航障碍程度超出了作为广泛使用的一般记忆功能测量方法的记忆商数所能预测的范围。