Willoughby Taura N, Thomas Matthew P L, Schmale Matthew S, Copeland Jennifer L, Hazell Tom J
a Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Faculty of Arts and Science , University of Lethbridge , Lethbridge , Alberta , Canada.
b Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Faculty of Science , Wilfrid Laurier University , Waterloo , Ontario , Canada.
J Sports Sci. 2016;34(13):1207-14. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1102316. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a 4-week running sprint interval training protocol to improve both aerobic and anaerobic fitness in middle-aged adults (40-50 years) as well as compare the adaptations to younger adults (20-30 years). Twenty-eight inactive participants - 14 young 20-30-year-olds (n = 7 males) and 14 middle-aged 40-50-year-olds (n = 5 males) - completed 4 weeks of running sprint interval training (4 to 6, 30-s "all-out" sprints on a curved, self-propelled treadmill separated by 4 min active recovery performed 3 times per week). Before and after training, all participants were assessed for maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), 2000 m time trial performance, and anaerobic performance on a single 30-s sprint. There were no interactions between group and time for any tested variable, although training improved relative VO2max (young = 3.9, middle-aged = 5.2%; P < 0.04), time trial performance (young = 5.9, middle-aged = 8.2%; P < 0.001), peak sprint speed (young = 9.3, middle-aged = 2.2%; P < 0.001), and average sprint speed (young = 6.8, middle-aged = 11.6%; P < 0.001) in both young and middle-aged groups from pre- to post-training on the 30-s sprint test. The current study demonstrates that a 4-week running sprint interval training programme is equally effective at improving aerobic and anaerobic fitness in younger and middle-aged adults.
本研究的目的是确定一项为期4周的短跑间歇训练方案对改善中年成年人(40 - 50岁)有氧和无氧适能的有效性,并比较其与年轻成年人(20 - 30岁)的适应性差异。28名缺乏运动的参与者——14名20 - 30岁的年轻人(7名男性)和14名40 - 50岁的中年人(5名男性)——完成了4周的短跑间歇训练(在可自行驱动的弧形跑步机上进行4至6次、每次30秒的“全力”冲刺,每次冲刺间有4分钟的主动恢复时间,每周进行3次)。在训练前后,对所有参与者进行了最大摄氧量(VO2max)、2000米计时赛成绩以及单次30秒冲刺的无氧性能评估。尽管训练使年轻组和中年组在30秒冲刺测试中,从训练前到训练后的相对VO2max(年轻组 = 3.9%,中年组 = 5.2%;P < 0.04)、计时赛成绩(年轻组 = 5.9%,中年组 = 8.2%;P < 0.001)、冲刺峰值速度(年轻组 = 9.3%,中年组 = 2.2%;P < 0.001)和平均冲刺速度(年轻组 = 6.8%,中年组 = 11.6%;P < 0.001)均有所提高,但对于任何测试变量,组间与时间之间均无交互作用。本研究表明,一项为期4周的短跑间歇训练方案在改善年轻和中年成年人的有氧和无氧适能方面同样有效。