Turkington Aidan, Duffy Michael, Barrett Suzanne, McCaul Rosalind, Anderson Richard, Cooper Stephen J, Rushe Teresa, Mulholland Ciaran
Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK;
School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK;
Schizophr Bull. 2016 May;42(3):626-32. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv155. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
The impact of political violence on individuals presenting with an episode of first episode psychosis has not been examined. Individuals were assessed for exposure to political violence in Northern Ireland (the "Troubles") by asking for a response to 2 questions: one asked about the impact of violence "on your area"; the second about the impact of violence "on you or your family's life." The participants were separated into 2 groups (highandlowimpact) for each question. Symptom profiles and rates of substance misuse were compared across the groups at baseline and at 3-year follow up. Of the 178 individuals included in the study 66 (37.1%) reported ahighimpact of the "Troubles" on their life and 81 (45.5%) ahighimpact of the "Troubles" on their area. There were no significant differences in symptom profile or rates of substance misuse betweenhighandlowgroups at presentation. At 3-year follow-uphighimpact of the "Troubles" on life was associated with higher Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) Total (P= .01), PANSS-Positive (P< .05), and PANSS-General (P< .01) scores and lower global assessment of functioning disability (P< .05) scores, after adjusting for confounding factors. Impact of the "Troubles" on area was not associated with differences in symptom outcomes. This finding adds to the evidence that outcomes in psychosis are significantly impacted by environmental factors and suggests that greater attention should be paid to therapeutic strategies designed to address the impact of trauma.
政治暴力对首次发作精神病患者的影响尚未得到研究。通过询问两个问题来评估北爱尔兰(“冲突”时期)个体遭受政治暴力的情况:一个问题询问暴力“对你所在地区”的影响;另一个问题询问暴力“对你或你家人的生活”的影响。针对每个问题,将参与者分为两组(高影响组和低影响组)。在基线和3年随访时,比较两组之间的症状特征和物质滥用率。在纳入研究的178名个体中,66人(37.1%)报告“冲突”对其生活有高影响,81人(45.5%)报告“冲突”对其所在地区有高影响。在就诊时,高影响组和低影响组之间的症状特征或物质滥用率没有显著差异。在3年随访时,在调整混杂因素后,“冲突”对生活的高影响与阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)总分更高(P = 0.01)、PANSS阳性得分更高(P < 0.05)、PANSS一般得分更高(P < 0.01)以及功能残疾总体评估得分更低(P < 0.05)相关。“冲突”对地区的影响与症状结果的差异无关。这一发现进一步证明了精神病的结局受到环境因素的显著影响,并表明应更加关注旨在解决创伤影响的治疗策略。